Heading Logo

After 58 years, Portage County health levy is approved

By Mike Sever | Staff Writer Published: May 8, 2013 4:00 AM
  • 1 of 1 Photos | View More Photos

Voters did something Tuesday they haven't done since the Eisenhower Administration -- they approved new money for the Portage County Health District.

Voters approved Issue 1, updating a 58-year-old, 0.4-mill levy that has been in effect since 1955, by a vote of 3,523 to 2,778, according to complete but unofficial final results from the Portage County Board of Elections. The victory came on voter turnout of 8.87 percent, the lowest in recent memory.

Read: Aurora voters reject 1.2-mill safety levy

"I guess the 39th time's the charm," said an ecstatic DuWayne Porter, health commissioner for the district that serves all of Portage except Kent and Ravenna.

"I can't tell you how much I want to thank the groups out there. They supported us this time like never before, they helped us get the word out" with letters in the Record-Courier and discussions on WNIR, Porter said. Replacing the levy will give the district the opportunity to bring in people and services that will lead to accreditation, something Porter said was in doubt before.

[Article continues below]

Read: 8.9-mill school levy in Kent passes

Without accreditation, the department could be forced into a merger with a neighboring county, he said.

"We may have been forced into a merger of some sort, with the state assigning us to any other health department and then assessing the townships and villages a fee to pay for the services," with no say so from local officials, he said.

Bob Palmer, health board president, said he was very grateful for the vote "because it's one of the giant steps we have to take to have the department accredited. We'll be able to do some things we have haven't been able to do, and provide more services to people."

Read: Hiram Township replacement levy passes

[Article continues below]

The original levy brings in about $200,000 a year and costs $2.60 a year for the owner of a home with a $100,000 market value.

Bringing the levy up to date will cost that same homeowner $10 more a year, or about $12.60 a year, and bring in $1.08 million per year. The health district serves most of the county. Residents of Kent and Ravenna did not vote on the issue as those cities have their own health departments.

The closest the levy came to passage was in November 2012, when the health department had the same replacement levy on the ballot and won in 10 of 27 jurisdictions voting.

The replacement lost then by 730 votes on a final tally of 28,761 against to 28,031 for the levy, a difference of 1.28 percent.

After November's narrow loss, Palmer said people seemed to increase their support for the department.

Read: Ravenna's Sharon Spencer, Steven Bailey to face off in November

"Suddenly, there seemed to be a realization that public health is very necessary," he said.

Bob Howard, board vice president and chairman of the levy committee, said he was also gratified at the levy's success.

"This one we actually put a lot of effort into. It's nice to see it pay off," he said. Howard said he felt the department's work with Kent and Ravenna departments, and getting a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation grant to study collaboration of the three departments raised people's attention.

"It's really gratifying. We appreciate the confidence of the voters and we will use the money to do very good things. We will be proactive, monitor the water supply and do what we can to protect it, and replace services we've had to drop over the years, and have some new services," Howard said.

That will include seeking input from the public, he said.

"We want to be responsive, both in the way we enforce existing rules and regulations, but also in the way we might be able to help schools and various communities begin to address some of the longer range health needs of the people we serve and who pay the bills," Howard said.

Porter said the department "will keep our promise to lower the water testing fees for those people concerned about fracking. We don't know what that will be yet."

Contact this reporter at 330-298-1125 or msever@recordpub.com

Rate this article

Do you want to leave a comment?   Please Log In or Register to comment.

stanback May 9, 2013 12:13 PM

@JustaThought- maybe 100% of the taxpayers ought to get out and vote. If 5% voted, that means that the 95% of the county that did not vote imposed the the additional tax on themselves.

@Redleg6- If one chooses to not vote because it is May or August, then the issue is not that important to them. Most probably did not show up to vote because it is not worth their time ($10-$20 more per year).

@BF777- if it does not pass then guess you might have to have it fixed and your neighbor won't have to worry about drinking their well water tainted with your sewage. I'm OK with that.

bf777 May 8, 2013 3:47 PM

For all of the people that have Septic Systems "LOOKOUT". The Health Dept will be knocking on your door to charge you a mandatory $50.00 to inspect your Septic System each year and if it does not pass guess what.

redleg6 May 8, 2013 12:45 PM

@JustaThought..That is why they put the levy's on the ballot in May/August hoping nobody will show up...There should be a law that levy's should be on the ballot only when there is a general election, to maximize voter turnout...

justathought1 May 8, 2013 11:46 AM

So roughly 56% of the whopping 8.87% of the voters who showed up to do their civic duty yesterday, supported the health levy....... I think that works out to approximately 5% of portage counties registered voters showed up yesterday and imposed an additional tax on 100% of the taxpayers....yep sounds like that one had some real support behind it.