|
||||||||||||
|
News Sections
Citizen Journalism
Community Papers
Marketplace
The Record Courier
Newspaper Subscriptions
|
Home |
Back
Plough has public defender arrested Attorney told judge he was not ready to try case he had for less than a dayAugust 17, 2007
By Dave O'Brien Record-Courier staff writer Portage County Municipal Court Judge John Plough ordered a Portage County public defender placed under arrest for contempt of court Thursday. The order was given after the attorney said he was unprepared and unable to begin a scheduled trial, having only been appointed to represent a defendant the day before the trial was scheduled to begin. Brian Jones, an employee of Portage County Public Defender Dennis Lager since May, was held in contempt of court during an afternoon trial at Portage County Municipal Court in Kent after he told Plough he was unable to go forward with the trial. Plough ordered a Portage County Sheriff's deputy to remove Jones from his courtroom in front of his client, spectators and courthouse employees. Jones is representing Jordan S. Scott, 20, who was arrested bby Kent police June 17 and charged with one count of misdemeanor assault. He was arraigned June 18 and is incarcerated in the Portage County Jail on an unrelated felony charge. Scott had a pre-trial hearing July 25, but according to Plough failed for almost two months to obtain counsel. He was appointed a public defender on Wednesday. With the trial set to begin at 11 a.m. Thursday, Plough moved the trial back to 1:30 p.m., giving Jones two-and-a-half-hours to prepare his case. Plough also noted from the bench the presence of a Record-Courier reporter and, from the bench, said he believed someone in the public defender's office was to blame for notifying the newspaper of the upcoming trial. A source, who requested anonymity, called the Record-Courier and informed a reporter of Plough's intent to hold Jones in contempt. The source also said the Portage County Public Defender's Office has a written policy not to take cases to trial with a single day's notice. When Jones brought up the existence of that policy in court Thursday, Plough told Jones it wasn't the time for "speeches" and asked if Jones wanted to make an opening statement. As Jones continued to explain the situation, saying he had a "pre-trial matter" to bring up, Plough interrupted him. "What pre-trial matter? Trial is starting right now," Plough said, refusing to hear Jones' arguments about the matter and again asking him if he was prepared to move forward. Jones said Lager sent a letter to Plough in August 2006 stating his concerns about Plough's treatment of defendants represented by public defenders, a letter Plough denied receiving. Plough also refused to take a new copy of the letter from Jones. After Jones was led out of the courtroom, Plough re-set Scott's trial for Aug. 24. He also admonished Scott for not securing legal counsel while incarcerated, something jail inmates are given the opportunity to do after their arraignments. "You had an opportunity since June 18 to get a public defender," Plough told Scott, who sat quietly throughout the incident. "Mr. Scott, you had two months to prepare for trial. It's not the court's fault you didn't do that." In court, Plough said he believed politics was to blame for the Record-Courier being contacted about the case. Plough is a controversial former Portage County Prosecutor and Ravenna attorney who won an upset victory for judge over several opponents in November 2005, even after he was rated "not recommended" for the bench by the Portage County Bar Association. It is not the first time a public defender has drawn Plough's ire in the courtroom. Public defender Robin Bostick also was threatened with contempt charges when appearing before Plough on a previous case with little time to prepare. That incident and others prompted Portage County Common Pleas Judge Laurie Pittman to file a complaint with the Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Ohio Supreme Court in May, alleging Plough had intimidated defendants, abused their rights to a speedy trial, issued inappropriate sentences and keeping incomplete or inaccurate records of trials. Such complaints normally are confidential, but the (Cleveland) Plain Dealer reported the complaint in a story shortly after it was filed. Plough was unapologetic for his actions Thursday. "The public defender's office is not going to impede justice in Portage County," he said. Comments
Please note by clicking on "Post" you acknowledge that you have read the
Terms of Service
and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed.
Recordpub.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.
Next 10 Comments
Posted by joe4 November 15, 2007
Bravo Judge Plough! Encores!!!
Posted by Ohio Gal September 25, 2007
Regardless if he survives another election he can walk away and know that he wasn't bought, bribed or had a subscription to the "club". He has brough justice to the criminals and the players don't like it. Here is a judge who your not hearing all the crimminals complain but other lawyers and judges, isn't that a little weird? He did what he was elected to do and if the voters of Portage County replace him with a team player then so be it. I like that he doesn't dole out slaps on the wrist, although I'm not a criminal and I'm not out to get any of my buddies or friends elected to a cushy retirement job.
Posted by Ravenna Ohio September 21, 2007
Well Marathon women, bet he doesnt survive another election.
Posted by _marathon_woman September 14, 2007
God forbid that someone stand up for what they believe in. This "reporter" is a biased, uninformed ass. His writing is juvenile at best, and he writes with a group think mentality.
I happen to really like John. He is healthy both in mind and body. He is a genuinely good guy and is trying to keep our community safe. I know him as a lawyer, a judge, a runner, and a friend. It is sad to see him attacked as if he wasn't a real person. I know how he feels. This same paper and same idiot readers tried to ruin my reputation, too. The strong survive. Period.
Posted by twins18 September 2, 2007
Hey Brindo, you the cop that patrolled the Hiram community a few years back?
Posted by Ravenna Ohio August 29, 2007
Hey jbrindo-Well you go ahead and be a Judge Plough supporter, my goodness I guess as long as he is fighting the "green machine" its ok to violate peoples rights. Did your parents ever say 2 wrongs dont make a right? Just wondering??? He is not suppose to be a dictator but a arbitrator.
Posted by wfedman2004 August 27, 2007
thank`s Koolaid Im just one of the few Portage County resident`s that pay attention and that ****** them off Im going though the same ******** he is going though .
Posted by NoKoolAid August 26, 2007
Wfedman has it about right...
Funny how he knows who the corrupt players are and understands the deal, but no one from the R-C or anyone else can get it... Who was Craig Stephens former law partner and now on the bench? Anyone, Anyone, Anyone??? God or her highness____________________... Great description of Plough Wfedman, you got it about right...
Posted by jwbiii August 26, 2007
Hey Ravenna Ohio. Get your head out of your butt. A judge's courtroom is a dictatorship and he can do what he wants. And I'm glad he can. Plough is standing up to the machine and it's about time someone did. Too bad he wasn't able to slam Paul Jones and his high priced lawyers!!
Posted by specialed August 23, 2007
so what- let me clear up a few things for you b/c it is obvious you dont know
1. first the prosecutor fills out the pretrial sheet not the defendant 2. second- it is not "A to apply for pd" it is a triangle, legal shorthand for defendant. 3. this means the prosecutor was reporting to the court that at the pretrial he spoke to the defendant. at that time the defendant chose not to speak to the prosecutor but wished to have an attorney speak for him. the defendant said he would apply for counsel. 4. this does not mean that is what he did. he would still need to fill out the appropriate forms with the clerk of courts or the pd's office only then can the pd be appointed to represent him whoever took that report was not remiss. all they do is file the paper. it is up to the defendant to make sure he has representation. leave it to someone else to take the blame! Next 10 Comments Login above or Register to comment. |
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||||