By Dave O'Brien
Record-Courier staff writer
A three-car crash on S.R. 14 killed an Industry Road resident, injured the two other drivers, sending one into the West Branch reservoir, and closed the road for the better part of the day Thursday.
The accident occurred at about 7:27 a.m., about two miles southeast of Ravenna where the corners of Charlestown, Edinburg, Ravenna Township and Rootstown meet.
A semi carrying dry concrete powder was eastbound when a car driven by Mary L. French, 78, of Edinburg, failed to yield at a stop sign at Industry Road and S.R. 14 and pulled out in front of the truck, according to the Ravenna Post of the Ohio Highway Patrol.
Truck driver Walter Jones, 44, of Cleveland, swerved and attempted to stop his truck, which was carrying 25,000 pounds of dry cement powder, and collided with French's vehicle.
French most likely was killed on impact, according to Ravenna Township Fire Chief Steve Bosso.
The collision almost sent the truck and the wreckage of French's Ford into the Michael J. Kirwan Reservoir at West Branch State Park. Meanwhile, a north-bound Jeep Cherokee driven by Peggy Griffith, 53, of Deerfield, swerved to avoid the crash and ended up in the reservoir.
Randy Harper of Bath was driving in a second cement truck behind Jones when he saw the wreck ahead of him. A retired police officer, Harper said he and Jones were eastbound on S.R. 14 toward Interstate 76 when he saw the first truck "go left, then go right" and then saw a "cloud of dust."
Harper said he didn't know what had happened until he turned onto Industry Road, stopped his truck, got out and "heard the lady (Griffith) screaming."
"She was screaming for help," he said.
Harper said he climbed over the guardrail and saw Griffith in her sinking car. He had taken off his jacket and was prepared to dive in, but was able to help pull her out of the water. He said she had a minor head injury and a broken leg.
Bosso said the Edinburg Fire Department transported Griffith to Robinson Memorial Hospital in Ravenna. A Ravenna City Fire Department ambulance took Jones there as well. Their injuries were not considered life-threatening.
Bosso said his department originally received a request for the Portage County Water Rescue Team and was on the scene by 8 a.m.
"When we got the call for the dive team, it was "car in the water, person out of the car,'" Bosso said. "I pulled up and thought "Wow, this is a lot different than I thought it was.'"
Jones' truck was "right on top of the Ravenna Township sign," Bosso said, but the area is near the border of four townships. He said he and Edinburg Fire Chief Tim Paulus took command of the scene, which crews were still working into the afternoon as wreckers cleaned up debris.
A large crane from Falls and Stebbins Automotive in Mantua was used to lift the nearly unrecognizable remains of the wrecked car onto a flatbed trailer. Floating booms were placed in the reservoir by hazmat crews to contain any spilled oil from the vehicles.
A total of about 50 personnel from local and county agencies eventually responded to the crash, Bosso said. Other fire departments responding with personnel or vehicles included Kent, Palmyra, Ravenna city, Ravenna Township, Rootstown and Streetsboro.
The northbound lane of S.R. 14 was closed until dark Thursday and will be closed again today for crews to excavate contaminated soil, according to The Ohio Department of Transportation. The one open lane of traffic will be maintained by flaggers.
ODOT advised motorists to detour onto S.R. 44 to the S.R. 5/44 bypass to I-76 to avoid the incident scene.
The Ravenna Post of the Ohio Highway Patrol is investigating.
Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed.
Recordpub.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.
all of you make me sick! I pray nothing happens to any of YOUR loved ones like this, to have you folks thinking you know all the answers and who to blam and why, being so happy to have something to post... someones age dosnt mean anything I was cut off TWICE last week from 2 people in their 30's talking on their cell phones as they breezed through the stop signs onto rt 224!!! One had children in the suv, wondered what you know it alls would have been posting then for their relatives to read!!! Couldnt blame THOSE ones on age, you DONT know what happened here. SO why not give it a break and have some respect!.... you didnt know her, or what kind of driver she was. signed a relative of Marys.
13.
Posted by Spilly May 23, 2008
Why don't you clowns take your debate to the nearest bar.
I'm sure you don't have any trouble dialing or chatting on your cell phone while you drive, yet you want to us an article about a tragic accident as a forum your sanctimonious carping.
Why don't you put down your cell phone while driving there, Peppermint? After all, there's a DIRECT CORRELATION between cell phone usage, and accidents.
No one has any evidence that being elderly had anything to do with this accident, yet you all don't hesitate to post your hypocritical opinions at all, do you?
Every person who has ever driven a car has had a number of lapses in judgement where they could have been killed. We've all absentmindedly run stop signs, failed you yield, etc., but there just wasn't a tractor trailer coming, was there?
If you zealots are interested in harping about accident statistics involving the elderly, mayber you should do some research? The other end of the human age spectrum causes many more fatal accidents than the elderly do, Einstein.
What should we do there? Only allow folks to drive between the ages of 25 and 60?
You folks are all truly idiots, you know that?
12.
Posted by s.swenson May 23, 2008
My sympathy to the friends and family of Mary French.
Gary it's more important for our seniors to not jeopardize their lives or the lives of others when they have reached the age of impairment, than to worry about how they will get to work. It's part of the aging process and they have to account for where they will live, where they will work and how they will get around when they start to loose some of their faculties and response times. It's not fair to others on the road to be put into danger by these people.
While on a recent vacation to Florida the land of the elderly the front page of the newspaper had an article about 2 accidents that happened involving the ederly. The first was a man who went to go across the Sky Way Bridge in Tampa and when he stopped to pay his toll, there was a body on the hood of his car, it was later determined he'd hit (and killed) the guy 30 miles previous. The paper went on to say with his age he'd just kinda forgotten he'd hit the guy. The second was a 85 year old women went off the road and killed two other 80 something year olds sitting on a bench waiting for the bus. The big dilemma was if they should put the 85 year old in jail or not? If it was anyone in their 20's, 30's, 50's or so you bet they would.
It's time to start testing the elderly and get them off of the roads if they are delayed in response time or reactions to save the lives of the innocent. What if the lady who's car went in the reservoir drowned and the truck driver was killed? We know she didn't wake up in the morning and say I'm going to go drive and cause an accident but I bet she wasn't aware or ready to acknowledge that due to age her driving should be monitored more closely.
I think after 65 it should be every 2 years til about 70 and then yearly. Some will scream discrimination I'm sure but c'mon our families and children are out there sharing the roads with these people. As far as the drunks that continue to drive, if and when they get caught there are consequences what about for the elderly, do they have to hurt, injure or kill someone first to loose their driving privileges???
Sorry so long winded, I was a little worked up!
11.
Posted by ranger cousin May 23, 2008
Mary Louise will be greatly missed by her many friends and family. She was very caring and made sure that she was at so many of my family's events, parties, celebrations, and most recently part of the passing of one of our family members. Even though she was not technically a family member we all thought of her as one of us. The Dillon's will miss her terribly.
10.
Posted by Peppermint May 23, 2008
I'm sure this lady WAS a nice person and I'm sorry for your loss.
The fact still remains that there is a DIRECT PROVEN correlation with more accidents related to elderly drivers than other aged drivers.
"The traffic accidents have been increasing every year, and the accident ratio of elderly people is larger than the others. One of the reasons is the depreciation of physical capability of elderly people. In this research, the driver's behavior is measured by the driving simulator which has the sensors attached to the steering, accelerator and brake. Moreover, we measure the fundamental characteristics related to the cognition, judgment and movement of a driver. From the investigation of each correlation, it is shown clearly how the depreciation of cognition, judgment and movement functions influenced the traffic accidents." http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=1041230
9.
Posted by wbw May 23, 2008
Instead of focusing on the age of Mary Louise, perhaps we should be more cautious as a whole when driving. I went to church with her and she was a kind lady. Regardless of age, this sort of accident can happen to any of us. If everyone would just look twice both directions and sometimes look a third time just to be certain, horrific accidents might be reduced.
God bless you Mary Louise. You will be missed.
8.
Posted by chayes2 May 23, 2008
I do think that we all need to be re-tested after a set time period. Our licenses should not be taken if we do not pass it on the first try, however if after trying 3 times in a certain time period, then it may be an option to take it.
To the friends and family of Ms. French my sincere sympathies.
To everyone, please be safe this holiday weekend, remember with gas prices up find someone who can afford the gas and make them be the DD.
7.
Posted by Peppermint May 23, 2008
SDS - I would MUCH rather pick my mother up and take her to work/run errands/find rides for her than to have her 1) dead or 2) have killed someone else.
My friend's father is 65 and has Parkinson's Disease. He still has a valid driver's license, but the family REFUSES to let him drive anymore. Of course, he wants to drive and thinks he can, but it is too risky with his tremors, shakes and possible seizures due to the disease.
Yes, I realize that elderly folks not wanting to give up their licenses because it takes away their independence, but what is the alternative? Letting more people get hurt/killed?
Driving is a privilege, not a right.
6.
Posted by agolive May 23, 2008
I agree that ALL people should have to be retested on their ability to drive properly and we should all have to take the "written" test too, to ensure that we are up to date with the rules and regulations.
Just last week, an older woman (probably 70 or older) was driving in the wrong lane and I had to Literally pull into someone's drive to avoid her hitting me (my 2 children were also in the car) This was also after I beeped my horn at her over and over. So needless to say it could have been a head on collision. I was so shook up that I couldn't get her plate number, but I did call and report where it happened and the description of her car. I hope she made it to where she was going safely.
As far as the comment made by Gary previously. I understand with the way the economy is today that you cannot survive on a fixed income (and most people over the age of 65 need to work to survive) BUT>>>> If you cannot drive, YOU CANNOT DRIVE!!! NO MATTER WHAT YOUR AGE!!! For everyone's safety, yourself and everybody else on the road. Look into alternative means of transportation... PARTA, Friends or family.
This is such a tragic event, and my thoughts and prayers are with everyone involved and their loved ones.
Be safe this weekend!
5.
Posted by sds May 23, 2008
Maybe there needs to be some sort of testing, but for those of you who say you would so willingly give up your right to drive, I doubt it. I doubt you would be so passively compliant to someone telling you you couldn't drive anymore. We've told people for years they can't drink and drive, but they do. What's the difference? "You're old so surrender your license and promise you'll never drive again"...won't happen. Also, if you so badly want "old" people to give up their licenses, are you going to give up your time to drive them somewhere? Don't say that's their family's job or public transportation because people work longer now than they used to and don't have time for mom, dad, grandma & grandpa anymore. Give up a license = give up independence. See how well that would really sit with you before you so quickly judge.
Copyright Record Publishing Co, LLC. 1995-2009. All Rights Reserved.
Content may not be republished without the expressed written consent of the publisher.