By Mike Sever
Record-Courier staff writer
About 35 striking bus drivers were on the picket line before dawn Monday in front of the Portage Area Regional Transportation Authority. Striking drivers were waving signs and getting honks of support from passing motorists on Summit Road, near S.R. 261 in Kent.
PARTA spokesman Frank Hairston said the strike has not impacted services.
"Everything is out on the road, transportation is going well for us," Hairston said Monday afternoon.
Gene Cozart, president of the local union of the Ohio Association of Public School Employees, said his members are prepared to stay on the line as long as it takes.
OAPSE represents about 66 full- and part-time drivers at PARTA, which has about 212 employees.
Cozart has been president since the local was formed three years ago. He drives a door-to-door route, taking riders to doctor's and other appointments. He and his riders get to know each other. Cozart said he's visited his riders in the hospital and attended their family funerals.
"We care for them. We provide good service. I feel bad for them, especially when you get scabs and inexperienced people driving them," Cozart said.
No new talks are scheduled. Both sides said they are open to meeting if the other side is willing to concede. Both sides said they are willing to endure the strike as long as it takes.
"We're continuing to say we're open to talks. We hope to hear something from the union or the mediator at any time. PARTA is ready to talk," Hairston said.
The issue of fair share is the primary roadblock. Under fair share, nonunion drivers would pay 2 percent of gross income to the union as an "administrative fee" to enjoy the fruits of the union contract, union officials have said.
PARTA is against imposing fair share, saying it would make it harder to recruit and retain drivers, and is an economic burden on part-time drivers.
Trina Molnar, OAPSE field representative, said PARTA has had problems retaining drivers. Of 110 drivers hired in the past two years, 50 have cycled out, she said. "The numbers speak for themselves. It's not because of fair share they're leaving," Molnar said.
"We think (fair share) is not a PARTA matter. It's a union matter. People need to decide for themselves," said Lloyd Rains, regional director of OAPSE. Rains said other issues include recognition of part-time service toward job seniority, benefits and guaranteed hours for part-time drivers.
Hairston said that is the first PARTA had heard that other issues were still in play.
Pickets were enjoying Monday's sunny, dry weather.
"The weather's cooperating more than PARTA is," Molnar joked.
Pickets weren't blocking buses or other vehicles from entering or leaving PARTA's headquarters, but were waving printed strike signs at drivers and other motorists. A few pickets had other, handmade signs, saying "scab" and "lowlife."
PARTA and OAPSE are now in their third year of negotiations. A federal mediator has been assisting, but the latest talks on Sunday broke up after about an hour and a half. PARTA wants OAPSE to offer a concession on fair share, and OAPSE was PARTA to agree as it stands.
Rains said this is the first time there has been a strike over fair share in the 100 locals in the Northeastern Ohio region of OAPSE. There are only about five locals in the Cleveland region that do not have fair share in their contract, Rains said.
Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed.
Recordpub.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.
I see both sides of the issue but really take offense at the statement PRTA keeps making about there being no disruptions of service. As a working parent who depends on the PARTA bus to get my child home from school, I have been directly impacted. Service to the Kent schools have been cut, leaving us to find (or not find) alternatives to get our children home. I for one cannot skip work to compensate for this service that we have grown to rely on. The strike is going to hurt both sides the longer it drags out, as people will be forced to learn to live without it. History has shown that prolonged strikes deteriorate the clientel for whatever is being affected, be it TV, sports or transportation. Lets get this settled, in good faith, and not blame all the woes on one issue.
11.
Posted by beezy August 29, 2008
I have mixed feelings on Unions. My father, grandfather, uncles, and brother's all belonged to unions. Half of who belonged lost almost everything and after 15-30 of membership. When companies go bankrupt and the workers are union members does not mean that they are taken care of. Loss of medical benefits, pension, and wages. On one account my uncle who work for LTV Steel just about lost EVERYTHING after putting in many years to LTV, and that is only one story. So no one is going to convince me that Unions are the way to go because I have seen many people get the short end of the stick from the Union. I have seen some good out of unions but for the most part it's really not as beneficial as most union supporter make them out to be.
10.
Posted by whydoicare August 29, 2008
First off, no one forces a union go on strike, they chose to do so and put it to a vote. Read the article, this isn't about pay, it is about 'fair share'. All these drivers who don't pay dues, still benefit from the contract that the union members negotiate, but they don't have to pay a dime to support that effort; TALK ABOUT LAZY AND IRRESPONSIBLE
And to all those people who say, 'They are lucky to have jobs.' All I can say is, yes they are, but that doesn' mean the American worker has to bend over and take it in the rear. PARTA drivers don't make that mutch and deserve every penny they get. At least they have the conviction to fight for their job. How many of their critics can say the same?
And to those who think Unions are ruining this country, pull your head out of your rear ends! The Unions were one of the only groups that openly opposed NAFTA, GAFT, and all these other trade policies that have gutted American manufacturing. I often think that anit-union sentiment is sour grapes by people who don't have the skills or abilities to get a good union job.
I support the PARTA drivers and hope that PARTA management puts this to rest and agrees to the fair share clause.
9.
Posted by driver August 27, 2008
To glenbob. You need to attend a PARTA board meeting to get the facts on the issues. Maybe then you won't look like such an idiot.
8.
Posted by Kyra August 27, 2008
The PARTA strike forces me to question my Democratic values. Mr. Frank Hairston, who claims to be an Democratic activist and "a man of the people" works for the very corporation that forced the drivers to go on strike. Having grown up in Ravenna, it's no wonder why my family and our friends left Ravenna for a better life. Frank Hairston, Kevin Poland and CHAIRMAN CRAIG should be ashamed of their Democratic leadership. While good Dems like Kathleen Chandler, Bill Davis and our County leaders work hard for true, Democratic values, I am suprised that no one in Ravenna is asking why Mr. Hairston has a conflict of interest in this current strike. Who will resolve it? Who has the answer? When you have one, please let the people know Mr. Mike Sever. Write an article about the people who can fix this. Not the men who play both sides and profit from it.
Luv,
Kyra
"Longing for my Old Ravenna with new leadership"
7.
Posted by tellnitlikeitis August 27, 2008
I don't quite know all the facts and issues here but it just seems a shame that everyday in the paper you read about closing companies and thousands of people that are out of work and then you have union people on strike because the terms aren't exactly what they want. I'm sure there are thousands of people that would give anything to have these jobs and be able to support their families. Also holding up signs calling the replacement drivers "scumbags" and "lowlifes".....why, because they are trying to make a living and support their families? And as for the one a$$'s comment(cozart) about feeling bad for the people having "scabs and inexperienced drivers" driving them to and from their doctors appointment, like they give two cents who drops them off at the doctors. And just how much "experience" does it take to drive a short bus. You are a "scumbag" Cozart.
6.
Posted by tellnitlikeitis August 27, 2008
I don't quite know all the facts and issues here but it just seems a shame that everyday in the paper you read about closing companies and thousands of people that are out of work and then you have union people on strike because the terms aren't exactly what they want. I'm sure there are thousands of people that would give anything to have these jobs and be able to support their families. Also holding up signs calling the replacement drivers "scumbags" and "lowlifes".....why, because they are trying to make a living and support their families? And as for the one a$$'s comment(cozart) about feeling bad for the people having "scabs and inexperienced drivers" driving them to and from their doctors appointment, like they give two cents who drops them off at the doctors. And just how much "experience" does it take to drive a short bus. You are a "scumbag" Cozart.
5.
Posted by Rob Anderson August 26, 2008
"The issue of fair share is the primary roadblock. Under fair share, nonunion drivers would pay 2 percent of gross income to the union as an "administrative fee" to enjoy the fruits of the union contract, union officials have said...
...PARTA wants OAPSE to offer a concession on fair share, and OAPSE was PARTA to agree as it stands."
Well, inquisitive minds want to know! Is the union-proposed fair share fee of 2% of gross income, as an "administrative fee", the same amount as the union dues for union members? If so, it ain't a right proposal! The folk paying fair share would not have voting rights or realize any other non-SERB-type benefits provided by the union to union members.
So, c'mon, one of you OAPSE administrative-policy-wonks! Just what percent of gross pay do the union members have to pay, eh? (Please don't tell me it's also 2%.) Those paying fair share should only have to pay 50% to 75% of what the full-ledged union membership pays, I'd think. Sounds like all the concession PARTA should expect on the issue, unless they want to continue on with some kind of union-busting philosophy.
4.
Posted by yourname August 26, 2008
glennbob is right. this country was built on small business owners. they have labor laws now, so there is no need for unions. if you don't like your job, start your own business!
3.
Posted by hangemhigh August 26, 2008
Glennbob is clueless !!! if it wasnt for unions the hard workers would still be making the same wage that the illegals are making now !! maybe if the TRUE people of this country was given everything for free to get a start things may not be this bad. are economy reflects on our wasteful government.
Copyright Record Publishing Co, LLC. 1995-2009. All Rights Reserved.
Content may not be republished without the expressed written consent of the publisher.