Quantcast
Wed Jan 07 2009 4:10 PM
Email:   Password:     |  Register/Subscribe
Search Site:
Advanced
Search
  Archive

FREE Sample
PDF Edition

USA Weekend

Home | Back

New calls for auto industry bailout Pelosi: Include in $700 billion bill

Email To A Friend
Printer Friendly
Comments
Add to Reddit Add to Digg Add to del.icio.us

A677b117084cd735dd27343c768b95cebfbee15d_gm_murp-thumb


HOLD FOR BUSINESS PHOTO DAN GOLDMAN:GMC SUV's are on sale at a dealership in Dormont, Pa., Tuesday, {ptcmonthnameap} 11, 2008. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)

Associated Press

WASHINGTON -- House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called for "emergency and limited financial assistance" for the battered auto industry on Tuesday and urged the outgoing Bush administration to join lawmakers in reaching a quick compromise.

Four days after dismal financial reports from General Motors Corp. and Ford Motor Co., Pelosi backed legislation to make the automakers eligible for help under the $700 billion bailout measure that cleared Congress in October.

In a written statement, the California Democrat said the aid was needed "in order to prevent the failure of one or more of the major American automobile manufacturers, which would have a devastating impact on our economy, particularly on the men and women who work in that industry."

"Congress and the Bush administration must take immediate action," she added. Administration officials have concluded that the bailout bill that passed earlier does not permit loans to the auto industry, but lawmakers are expected to return to the Capitol for a brief postelection session beginning next week.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., also supports help for the industry, and he issued a statement saying Democrats were "determined to pass legislation that will save the jobs of millions" as part of a postelection session.

"This will only get done if President Bush and Senate Republicans work with us in a bipartisan fashion, and I am confident they will do what is right for our economy," he said.

The plight of the industry has drawn attention from the White House and the incoming Obama administration in recent days, as well as among lawmakers.

Last week, President-elect Obama prodded the Bush administration to do more to help the industry, and on Monday, aides said he raised the issue with President Bush in an Oval Office conversation meant to underscore a smooth transition of power.

Officials familiar with the conversation said the president replied he was open to the idea.

Before adjourning for the elections, Congress passed legislation providing for $25 billion in government-backed loans to the automakers to prod them to retool their factories to make more efficient vehicles.

Since then, executives from GM, Ford and Chrysler LLC and officials in the United Autoworkers union have called for more than that to avert a possible collapse of one of the nation's most basic industries, including a $25 billion loan to help keep the companies afloat and $25 billion more to help cover future health care payments for about 780,000 retirees and their dependents.

GM and Ford reported last week that they spent down their cash reserves by a combined $14.6 billion in the past three months. Ford said it would slash more than 2,000 white collar jobs.

Pelosi's statement did not specify how large an aid package she prefers.

Instead, she said she had asked Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, to draft legislation.

A companion effort is under way in the Senate.

The Senate is scheduled to meet next week in a postelection session, but until Pelosi issued her statement, it was not clear the House would follow suit.

The House already has passed legislation to provide additional unemployment insurance benefits for some of the growing ranks of the nation's jobless, as well as a separate measure to stimulate the economy.

That meant the Senate could have passed either or both bills and sent them to the White House for Bush's signature without further action by the House.

Pelosi's announcement changed that, and raised the possibility of a postelection session that covers more areas.

The Bush administration, for example, has said that enactment of a free trade agreement with Colombia is its top priority in Congress.

Many Democrats oppose the proposed agreement as written. But it is unclear what, if any, compromise might be possible that would allow auto assistance and a trade agreement to be the last major measures signed into law by the outgoing president.

In her statement, Pelosi said any assistance to the industry should include limits on executive compensation, rigorous government review authority and other taxpayer protections.




Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. Recordpub.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Login above or Register to comment.
 5 Total Comments
5.
    Posted by grnfrnow November 14, 2008
Give GM to Shell Oil, Ford to BP and Chrysler to Exxon Mobile, have them bail them out!! They sure have enough money. It is about time "Big Oil" gives something back to America. These companies go hand in hand. There..fixed!

4.
    Posted by PUBA November 12, 2008
Will there be no end in site? Do we want the government to own and run everything? Why can't the car industries file bankruptcy and restructure there factories and benefits?

What about the small business owners that might be struggling? Who is helping them?

Give me a break, this is not Cuba people....

3.
    Posted by kimbakj November 12, 2008
Why does'nt the dumb bunnies in Washington limit the number of foreign cars coming into the U.S ? If Japan or Korea sends a certain volume of cars over, tax the crap out them.Put more American cars on the road,remove some of the EPA crap imposed on American car makers,and get business going again?Japan and everybody else in the world puts limits on how many cars we can send over to their roads, we should impose the same restrictions.I' d rather support an American auto maker with EVERYTHING made in America and support the American worker.But, the Washington butt heads will not listen to the people they take the money from to bail out businesses they screwed anyway.

2.
    Posted by The Liberal_Exposer November 12, 2008
There was nothing about a trade off with Columbia. I thought trickle down economics didn't work, according to the Dumocrat socialists. But it does in this case? Talk about wanting to have it both ways.

1.
    Posted by savdi November 12, 2008
I think the government should help the auto industry because it effects so many people all around this country. The trickle down effect if the auto industry fails would be enormous. What I don't understand is why the Bush Administration feels it necessary to use trade with Columbia as a trade off. It has NOTHING to do with the auto industry all it could be called is blackmail. I agree that any government support should have limitation such as limiting the amount of money the companies can use to pay any CEO's or any top executives or throw lavish parties at spa resorts as well. They have already received so much pay and bonusus they should all be doing what Iacocca and take only $1.00/yr in salary. That goes to all the other industries like AIG, Fannie and Freddie and any other company that receives money from the government...... no exceptions.


Terms of Service Copyright Record Publishing Co, LLC. 1995-2009. All Rights Reserved.
Content may not be republished without the expressed written consent of the publisher.
Dix Communications