Quantcast
Home | Back

Kent redevelopment talks continue No formal agreement yet for downtown hotel, conference center

Share Story:     Share_email E-mail Story    |    Share_print Print Story    |    Comments    |   

 

 

By Matt Fredmonsky

Record-Courier staff writer

Kent city and Kent State University officials continue talks with private developers on a hotel and conference center and estimated $40 million to $55 million downtown redevelopment project.

Dan Smith, Kent’s economic development director, said city and university leaders meet regularly with the private development firms interested in working downtown, but the discussions have not risen to the point of signing either a development agreement or a memorandum of understanding.

Smith said an agreement to work together in Kent has been signed by the private developers involved, which includes: Fairmount Properties of Cleveland; Pizzuti Companies, the Columbus-based hotel firm headed by Kent native Ronald Pizzuti; Omni Hospitality, a Solon-based hotel developer; and Street-Works Development Group, a planning firm with offices in New York and Virginia. 

“They’ve all signed an agreement to work together,” Smith said.

Both the city and KSU own property in the block bordered by Haymaker Parkway, South Water, South DePeyster and Erie streets, where Fairmount Properties has planned its mixed-use development with retail, residential and restaurant spaces. 

Kent City Council was set to consider its own agreement with Fairmount on the project in December, but Kent City Manager Dave Ruller said the meeting was canceled because the draft agreement with Fairmount had not been finalized.

University leaders are optimistic both the hotel and conference center and mixed-use redevelopment will come to fruition, as university officials have been asked to formalize the institution’s role in the project by becoming a signatory to a future development agreement.

KSU President Lester Lefton said university officials are working closely with city leaders and the private developers to move the hotel and conference center forward.

“There are schematics, there are sketches, there are ideas,” Lefton said. “The city is purchasing property. We are purchasing property. We’re far along, but there is not a deal yet to do it. But we’re close.”

The city recently began to develop new agreement terms as the university better defined its level of participation. 

But all the project elements have to line up for progress to take place, Smith said.

“You have to have financing that works,” he said. “You have to have busineses that can operate at that level, and then you have to have the public and private support.”

Smith said the collapse of the financial markets in October, and the resulting inability to obtain financing for real estate development, created a significant challenge for the project.

“We’re investigating all avenues of financing the project,” Smith said. “I think it’s still extremely likely. At what level the final project comes in at, I’m not sure. But the fact that we have ownership in the area ... without question a project is going to happen on that site.”

Record-Courier staff writer Colin McEwen contributed to this story.

 

Previous Articles:

Kent council cancels meeting

Dec. 9, 2008

http://www.recordpub.com/news/article/4467704

 

Hotel study results to be released Cleveland-based firm partnering with KSU, Kent on downtown project

Nov. 16, 2008

http://www.recordpub.com/news/article/4467704

 

Economy slows downtown Kent plan Officials remain optimistic about proposed redevelopment project

Nov. 16, 2008

http://www.recordpub.com/news/article/4467703

 

 




Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. Recordpub.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Login above or Register to comment.
 1 Total Comments
1.
    Posted by Fair Tax March 22, 2009
It is time for the developers to put up or shut up about their involvement in the downtown development project. I think it would be prudent for Kent to start talking with other developers that have the capital to invest and move on with conrete work instead of talk about studies. Fairmount can claim it is performing studies but it is all on paper without any tangible results. This situtation is getting to be the same as the situation with previous developers. The City paid a premium for property the last two years because the city administration believed that would kick start the project. Well it has not helped. Council should not approve spending anymore money on this until the developers make a financial commitment. Council and administration should ask Fairmount to pay for demolishing the old buildings as a sign of their committment to move forward. Kent has spent enough money on the properties, money that could have been spent on repairing roads over the last five years.

Home | Back