Home | Back

Scientist says time travel is possible: Shares idea for time machine at Kent State

Share_print Print Story    |    Comments    |   

By Colin McEwen

Record-Courier staff writer

Can people travel back in time or jump ahead into the future?

Ronald Mallett says they can.

Mallett, a professor of theoretical physics at the University of Connecticut, spoke about those scientific possibilities to a group of about 150 people in the Kiva at the Kent Student Center Tuesday.

“This may sound like it’s been ripped from the pages of science fiction,” said Mallett. “Yet, I believe the 21st century will be seen as the century of time travel, just as the 20th century is seen as the century of air and space travel.”

Stemming from Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, Mallett shared basic insight about how time travel could be achieved.

First, as objects travel faster, time slows down. If someone traveled deep into space at a great speed, that person could return younger than his or her grandchildren, he said.

Mallett also shared his own theories of time travel, combining Einstein’s theory of relativity with the idea that a continuously circulating unidirectional beam of light creates a gravitational field.

Light affects gravity and gravity affects time, so Mallett realized he could use light to affect time. He believes light causes space to become “twisted.”

“What you do to space also happens to time,” he said, adding that he has begun work on a time machine consisting of a high-powered laser and mirrors. 

“This has all been worked out mathematically even if it may seem pedestrian,” he said.

Going back into the past isn’t so easy. In fact, Mallett theorizes that once someone travels back in time, it creates a paradox, leaving the person stuck in that time.

Mallett is the author of “Time Traveler: A Scientist’s Personal Mission to Make Time Travel a Reality.” Academy Award nominated director Spike Lee plans to make a feature film about Mallett and his life as a scientist.

 

 




Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. Recordpub.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Login above or Register to comment.
Jump to Page: 1 2
   Next 10 Comments of 16 Total Comments
16.
    Posted by laurae April 10, 2009
Never Say Never!!
I sure wouldn't mind getting back the last 20 years I wasted on a marriage that didn't work out. Think of the possibilities. If only.....

15.
    Posted by The Liberal Exposer April 9, 2009
Hey Rob, lay off the weed before you post.

14.
    Posted by AndySwainey April 9, 2009
I'd like to go back and get myself a Model-T. I wonder how much that would cost.

I'd even pay for a trip to go back into the 1800's and start pannin' gold during the goldrush.

I'd really like to know how much his lectures are. Jesus Christ, no wonder education is expensive. What a dumb mother*ucker.

13.
    Posted by Rob Anderson April 8, 2009
@ the_lil'exposeddude...

yeah, right, all while George Lite couldn't alter the flow of Social Security or Federal Overtime regulations, let alone the Middle East. Um...wanna' compare li'l Georgies electoral mandate with the obamameister's???

Um...fyi, grr-ack-thpt(!)...TLE...I voted Libertarian as I couldn't stomach the big-money interests backing both the Dems or Repubs, eh?

And Pat Paulson is no longer in contention.

Now, on to banter with a universal entity of a more intelligent nature...w21...as an old curmudgeon-of-a-carpenter, I'm nothing but a layman, if that, in this arena. My observations are based solely on the information in the Stater article.

I believe the description provided more described a possible "fountain of youth" than anything resembling "time travel"...but at what cost?

Light is energy, to be sure, but it is a form of energy created only through certain circumstances and requiring certain physical conditions. Our sun may exert a gravitational influence, but it's due to it's mass of gasses(et al), not the light it emits. Just how much light do you think was created by such energy outbursts? Did any of our Nation's experiments involving atomic/hydrogen/neutron bombs alter the gravity around our planet? If they did the results are 'very top secret'.

Um...as far as K.S.U.'s LCI research...I'm glad some Korean or other folk are managing to benefit from it, because the common, hard-working, tax/tuition-paying citizen of Northeast Ohio certainly hasn't realized a living from same(IMHO).

12.
    Posted by onesmallvoice April 8, 2009
I can only guess what your reaction would have been the first time someone suggested that man could fly.

11.
    Posted by onesmallvoice April 8, 2009
Wow, if it was up to you guys, we'd still be driving buggys if we ever got around to even inventing the wheel. But then, conservatives have always been such visionaries.

10.
    Posted by The Liberal Exposer April 8, 2009
Rob Anderson says:
"Gravity created without any need for "mass"??? Ok, if you say so, but how dense or massive(?) would such a beam of light have to be to generate a gravitational field?"

Sonds like your boy zer0-Bama needs to get on solving these and other mysteries of the universe right away. He's just a qualified in this field as he is in running the country.

9.
    Posted by sugbear721 April 8, 2009
The round Earth theory will surely be disproven as well.

Open your minds. Wrister21 is on it here.

8.
    Posted by bzspanker April 8, 2009
This Prof must be a hippee left over from the sixites, he must have taken too many drugs. LOL!!!

7.
    Posted by Army First Sergeant April 8, 2009
Is this story a joke? Leave it to KSU to give this nutjob a platform.

   Next 10 Comments | Home | Back