By Julie Carr Smyth Associated Press COLUMBUS " It's not easy to make a splash when you're the state auditor. But Ohio Auditor Mary Taylor did just that last week. Taylor, a Republican, released her own analysis of Ohio's budget condition. It showed that the state would face an $8 billion gap in two years, after federal stimulus money and other one-time funds the Democratic governor is counting on dry up. The state auditor doesn't typically play a role as fiscal watchdog of the state budget, but Taylor made a deft political calculation in determining it was the time to step in. For one thing, her fellow Republicans in the Legislature are in a quandary over Strickland's budget. Until details were released on Thursday, House Democrats who control that chamber had kept the fine points of their school-funding rewrite close to the vest. And, even after the press conference and document release, the minority GOP caucus must still wait until next week " like the rest of the public " to see the exact language of a substitute budget bill. Republicans hold a majority in the Ohio Senate, meanwhile. But there, too, the GOP finds itself in a bind. As of Friday, the state budget " a massive policy document detailing $54 billion in state spending over the two years that start July 1 " wasn't expected to emerge from the House and sent to the Senate until the last week of April. By statute, the budget must be signed into law by June 30. That gives the Senate an unusually small time window " one-third the time the House took " to make its own budget revisions. And the changes will have to include the Republican response to Strickland's school-funding concept, a complete overhaul of how Ohio pays for public schools. So Taylor put her staff, which includes former Republican state budget director Tim Keen, to work on the numbers for the good of her fellow Republicans. House Republican Leader Bill Batchelder commended her for her "forward thinking." "Since legislators have not been able to obtain clear information from the Strickland administration, this analysis was much needed," he said in a statement. But Taylor's act wasn't purely magnanimous. Politically, Taylor aspires at minimum to be re-elected in 2010. She's also eyeing the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by George Voinovich and, with her statewide success, might even want to run for governor someday. Last week's splash, and an earlier ruckus she raised over the Strickland administration's books being potentially "unauditable," are improving her visibility and placing her sometimes sleepy office in the limelight. The results of her budget analysis also underlined two themes about Strickland's plan that Republicans have been trying to hammer home " and undoubtedly would love to use against Strickland when he runs for re-election. First, it emphasized that his budget is reliant on a good chunk of one-time money (a criticism out-of-power Democrats once lobbed at Republicans). Second, it shows that the Strickland administration's budget numbers haven't always added up. Ohio Democratic Chairman Chris Redfern labeled the whole exercise disingenuous. "It's time for Mary Taylor and Ohio Republicans to get honest with the people of Ohio," he said. "They have made it clear they oppose Ohio benefiting from billions in job creation funds provided by President Obama. That leaves only two options: either they want a massive tax hike on Ohioans or devastating cuts to job creation, education and health care for Ohio families." Strickland responded to her report with a statement. "If we put aside heated rhetoric and partisan gamesmanship, there emerges a simple truth about federal stimulus resources. Without them, more Ohioans would lose jobs, fewer Ohioans would have access to health care, teachers would be laid off, tuition would increase, prisons would be forced to close, mental health and other important community services would be cut, and fewer Ohio jobs would be created." Strickland also hinted, between the lines, that Taylor was using her state office " the only one the once-powerful Ohio GOP now controls " for the benefit of her colleagues in the Legislature. "If these are the actions that Mary Taylor and legislative Republicans are advocating for," he said, "they should come out and say so."
Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed.
Recordpub.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.
Login above or Register to comment.
9 Total Comments
9.
Posted by High Holy Grand Poo-Bah April 22, 2009
Exposer,
You wrote, "Bush was already blamed for all of this"
And, of course, that would have been the wrong thing to do.
And don't you hate it when someone constantly blames the president or one side of politics for Every single bad thing that happens? I know that I find it annoying. Do you know anyone like that? Do you know of anyone that constantly criticizes one side no matter what the situation? Now, who could that be?
8.
Posted by The Liberal Exposer April 22, 2009
"By the way, You missed some golden opportunities to insult some liberals and blame Mr. Obama in other articles."
I would, but Bush was already blamed for all of this.
7.
Posted by High Holy Grand Poo-Bah April 21, 2009
Exposer,
Provide another example of what? Of why you are a dork.
Oops, that is the insult that you used. Ummm...I mean ...You're a....Oh, Yeah!! Well you smell of... umm. OH, I can't think of any good comebacks. I guess you "got" me. You are sooo much better at insults to support your argument than I am.
By the way, You missed some golden opportunities to insult some liberals and blame Mr. Obama in other articles. See:
- ReStore to mark Earth Day - The Habitat for Humanity (I am sure this is Obama's fault in your opinion)
- 1,000 gather to commemorate Columbine victims (I am sure this is Obama's fault in your opinion)
- Ann Rutherford to speak at KSU (I am sure this is Obama's fault in your opinion)
- Motorcycle hits deer in Rootstown; 2 riders sent to RMH (I am sure this is Obama's fault in your opinion)
6.
Posted by Fair Tax April 21, 2009
Wow. I wish Mary Taylor would come to Kent and tell city council to stop budgeting deficits since the deficit spending is unsustainable.
5.
Posted by The Liberal Exposer April 21, 2009
"The point is - when she works, it is with the intention of bringing the other side down. It is not simply crunching numbers."
Provide another example. You can't. Insult? Dork.
4.
Posted by perduem1 April 20, 2009
Wow, what a concept. If someone (Democrat Politicians) won't give you facts surrounding their budget requests (stalling, don't know the answers), then dig around and get the information as best you can! Hoorah, for Mary Taylor, she went out and got the information.
Let's hope that the information she accumulated is put to good use in order to thwart additional taxes, larger government, and bloated regulations.
For Strickland to say "If these are the actions that Mary Taylor and legislative Republicans are advocating for.. they should come out and say so" Then I must say the Governor understands Mary Taylor is doing the right thing, but he can't bring himself to say it!
3.
Posted by High Holy Grand Poo-Bah April 20, 2009
DoWhatsRight,
If there is a liberal news media cover up, then why is this article even here? I find irony here. I love irony.
I have seen Ms. Taylor speak. She has a huge bias. That is not a bad thing. The point is - when she works, it is with the intention of bringing the other side down. It is not simply crunching numbers.
Now I'm gonna sit back and wait for The Exposer to insult me. I know it is coming. Go ahead Exposer, get it all out.
2.
Posted by DoWhatsRight April 20, 2009
Here we go again, the liberal news media trying to spin a yarn to cover the democrat's big time screw up. The part about what they think Ms. Taylor may or may not do in the future is not the issue. The issue is that it is Ms. Taylor's job to audit the books. She is doing this and she said they do not add up. The paper should be looking into this matter. Either they do add up, in which case Ms. Taylor is not competent, or they do not, in which case the democrats are not competent or trying to pull a fast one.
This is a perfect example of why the news media is dying in this country. Their bias is so obvious that a blind man could see it. The news media should dig into this and let us know the truth not anyone's political agenda.
1.
Posted by The Liberal Exposer April 20, 2009
Way to go Strickland and Defacrats. But a bunch of cockroaches hiding the budget in the cracks. Just like your counterparts in Washington and the "stimulus" package in not allowing enough time, if any, to read or understand what they are voting on. Send the nit-wit Defacrat Strickland packing ASAP.
Copyright Record Publishing Co, LLC. 1995-2010. All Rights Reserved.
Content may not be republished without the expressed written consent of the publisher.