Home | Back

Unruly parties in Kent cost $26,259 Hundreds of manpower hours required to maintain control in city

Share_print Print Story    |    Comments    |   

 

By Matt Fredmonsky

Record-Courier staff writer

Kent paid a high price for safety personnel staffing during the College Fest riot and ensuing efforts to curb further unrest during parties planned the following weekend.

William Lillich, Kent’s safety director, estimated the costs associated with staffing and overtime hours incurred by the city’s police and fire departments on April 25, the day of the College Fest riot, and the following Friday and Saturday when advertised parties were planned for two other neighborhoods.

Lillich estimated the response from Kent’s police, fire and service departments resulted in a $26,259 cost for increased staffing and overtime.

More than 50 people were arrested stemming from the incidents at College Fest. An an additional 17 people were arrested during the following weekend’s parties, Shermania and Drinkin’ on Lincoln.

Lillich said the expenses will be covered by general operating funds and are not expected to have a tremendous impact on the safety budget. 

“Certainly an expense up at that level will have some impact, but the budget is built to be able to deal with some unanticipated costs,” Lillich said.

The city can recoup some money through fines paid by those arrested, but only by those charged with misdemeanors. Felony charges are handled through the state.

“We really never gain back the expenses involved with an incident like this,” Lillich said. “We have heard some of the (fines) were averaging $150.”

The safety director’s estimates do not include the manpower provided from the 11 police and 12 fire agencies that responded with mutual aid. Lillich said those communities will not be reimbursed by the city.

“We just owe them a lot of service in return, which we try and provide in a variety of ways,” he said.

On April 25, the night of the riot on East College Avenue, 23 Kent police officers worked with 10 Kent firefighters and a total 132 mutual aid personnel. Between May 2 and May 3, 129 officers and 21 fire personnel worked more than a combined 500 hours.

On April 25, Metro SWAT provided the most mutual aid hours, 170, and personnel, 32. The Ohio Highway Patrol worked 110 hours, followed by Portage County Sheriff’s Office personnel providing 100 hours and KSU police at 50. Beginning May 2, Metro SWAT worked 208 total hours followed by 184 from the state patrol and another 100 hours from the sheriff’s office.

In addition, the damage caused to the pavement by the bonfire in the street and the stolen street signs amounted to $5,392 in service department labor and repairs costs.

Next week, Kent City Council is set to renew a mutual aid agreement with Kent State University for police aid on campus. The contract typically is renewed every four years. The KSU police department was one of the departments to provide assistance both during the College Fest weekend and the following weekend.

“It took a lot of effort on the part of a lot of people,” Lillich said. “We were very fortunate to have some of our neighbors willing to assist.”

 




Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. Recordpub.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Login above or Register to comment.
Jump to Page: 1 2
   Next 10 Comments of 14 Total Comments
14.
    Posted by toxic nut May 17, 2009
plough is mentally incompetent.

13.
    Posted by Coruscant May 16, 2009
Taxes? Why on earth do you people insist on taxing everybody to death??? Perhaps a tax on blatant displays of ignorance in online forums would be a good idea.

Anyone ever think of making the people responsible for these costs pay them??? Maybe Judge Plough can just divide the costs among everyone convicted out of these incidents.

12.
    Posted by YankieBlue May 16, 2009
Oh come on, the city gets plenty of money in the form of KSU employee income tax money to cover this meager bill.
Besides,
Kent has been the city to party in since the 60's ..it's tradition.

Without the campus draw, Kent has NOTHING special. Might as well be Ravenna.
and we all know how you Kentites feel about Ravenna.

11.
    Posted by BigNugget May 15, 2009
A tax on alcohol makes sense since most of the participants were drinking all day and alcohol seems to be the common denominator for disorderly behavior here and at other campus riots. But, I guess someone could make the case that eveyone ate a piece of bread that day too.
Even though only 25 students were arrested, there may have been large numbers of students in the crowd throwing things who just were not caught.

10.
    Posted by streakinduck May 15, 2009
Good point. What about bicycle tires and tennis shoes? Once the city goes green with its multi-modal facility, there will be thousands of people coming into town to use our bike trails! We could also take paddles for kayaks and worms for fishing! We could be the environmental tax capital of the world!

9.
    Posted by KentBiz May 15, 2009
Not everyone eats bread, streakinduck. Usually the suggested item to tax is toilet paper- something everyone uses. However, in some sections of kent even this is debateable. The city wouldn't have made a dime with the crowd that was leaching off the downtown on Earth Day.

8.
    Posted by streakinduck May 15, 2009
An alcohol tax? Why don't we tax babies? Or how about burritos? That is an idiotic idea Starryrant. While I appreciate the creativity in finding something to offset the price that was paid for the riots, the solution will also burden the citizens of Kent. So why not put an extra tax on bread? Everybody uses that!

7.
    Posted by onesmallvoice May 15, 2009
While there is no excuse for this kind of behavior, realisticaly there were 25 students arrested out of over 22,000. (25 arrested were non students) Why condem the entire university, especially with what they contribute to the local economy?

For that kind of money we could have had another pointless recall.

6.
    Posted by KentBiz May 15, 2009
You're simply amazing Gary. Ignorant comments like this just undermine any argument you may try to make. Please move back to Ravenna.

5.
    Posted by glasshalffull May 15, 2009
Gary, as always you continue to amaze me with the lack of knowledge and lack of common sense in your comments. If you are so unhappy here in Kent and you dislike the students so much why do you live here? It is really not good for your health to be this angry all of the time. Take all of this energy that you spend being angry and find something you feel passionate about and spare all of us. Goodness gracious!

   Next 10 Comments | Home | Back