Quantcast
Home | Back

City budget cuts eyed in Ravenna 2011 pending deficit will force measures

Share_email E-mail Story    |    Share_print Print Story    |    Comments    |   

 

By Matt Fredmonsky

Record-Courier staff writer

Every city department in Ravenna could be facing a cut in its budget as city leaders brace for a pending deficit in 2011.

Members of the Ravenna City Council budget commission met Wednesday to discuss potential methods for saving money and cutting expenses in the city’s budget. 

Council members directed city administrators to meet with all of the city’s department heads to determine what expenses could be cut within each department budget. Members of the council budget commission also asked Finance Director Kim Cecora to report back to council after meeting with representatives from the city’s police and fire unions.

Councilman Joe Bica said the city needs to consider making some progressive, aggressive cuts to bring the city’s expenses in line with its shrinking revenue streams.

“The department heads need to come back and be prepared to make ... a percentage cut,” Bica said.

Councilman Fran Ricciardi said he believes all options should be on the table.

“For purposes of argument, I think we have to assume the economy is going to get worse before it turns around,” Ricciardi said. “I think we need to work from things non-personnel initially and work our way from there.”

Bica pointed to three causes of the city’s declining revenue. Ravenna has lost about $300,000 in interest income due to current financial rates. In recent years, the city has chipped away at the surplus in its general fund to cover other expenses.

And Ravenna has lost about $200,000 of income tax revenue due to plant closing and job losses.

Cecora said, since 2004, the city has lost 1,400 jobs. The past 18 months have been the worst, he said, since the city experienced the closing of Ravenna Aluminum.

The city has balanced its 2010 budget by cutting roughly $100,000 in expenses, Cecora said. But the city could experience a deficit in 2011.

“At this juncture we can’t look to the economy as the solution to this situation,” he said.

 




Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. Recordpub.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Login above or Register to comment.
 6 Total Comments
6.
    Posted by fnslft3471 July 24, 2009
Never fear!!!! Paul Jones will be out of the big house in just over a month. He will come back and balance the budget!!

To bad his shill in the service department doesn't know how to balance budget... Paul taught him well

5.
    Posted by dp July 23, 2009
Dose of Reality - well put!

4.
    Posted by thinblueline July 23, 2009
Now, if we could just get the county officials to stop spending for outrageous projects. 4.5 million on a new prosecutor's office and now they want to build a new courthouse in Kent! When is it all going to end? Yesterday's RC showed a picture of two new sheriff's cruisers. They didn't show you a picture of the USED cruisers their considering buying from Geauga County because they don't have enough money to buy an entire fleet of cruisers!
No wonder, it's all tied up in the prosecutor's palace.

3.
    Posted by ravennaresident July 23, 2009
Let's first start by stop passing "emergency ordinances" like paying for someone disc jockey services for summer day camp? buying t-shirts for RAC personnel? back-up cleaning services for the Annex building - for the purchase of trees for Chestnut Hills park - increase the pay for the Law Director's part-time secretary........................ on an on

2.
    Posted by DoWhatsRight July 23, 2009
This is just another case of poor planning. They go ahead with all of the dam services which only serve a few citizens without caring about the cost. They figured the taxpayers will keep on paying. Look at how many administrative people they have and look at the salary they make. Look at the money they spend to send them to their respective Association meetings. Look at how many good old boys they keep on the payroll as a voting machine to keep them is office.

I believe we, the taxpayer should say, "No way, we ain't going to pay!"

1.
    Posted by Dose of Reality July 23, 2009
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES & OFFICIALS SHOULD FIRST SET THE EXAMPLE WHILE CUTTING OFF THE FAT WITHIN.

Folks, this is just the beginning. The Politians and City Officials (local, county, county & federal) are not speaking the truth about the financial deficit over the next few years.

What you will hear is how they have to support services, services and more services.

While employed, I enjoyed job security coming from personal commitment, maintaining a professional attitude along with dedicated responsibility to my (private) employer. My job benefits included partial employer health care (employer contributed 40% of monthly policy), two weeks vacation (without any roll-over or accumulation), basis holiday pay with conditions such as working the day before and the day after the holiday if they fell within Monday thru Friday. A 401K Plan with no employer contribution but at least we had some type of retirement plan. No pension like almost every non-government employee.

This private employer made some hard decisions a few years ago which included lay-offs and yes, I was one of the unfortunate n the block. In all the company is surviving the times and many others have kept their jobs in the process while remaining competive in there market.

Government on the other hand has not prepared for the times while over the past four years the economy has tanked our government has maintained spending and taxing. Now their awake!

In my opinion, every government employee should make concessions and appreciate the positions and job opportunity first.

Taxpayers can not continue to allow government to pay for all or the majority of employee healthcare, retirement plans/pensions, dollar for dollar or percentage of matching 401 contribution plans, extreme vacation benefits exceeding three weeks, 14 paid holidays over and above vacation days, continued annual increases based on inflation or cost of living, etc

This is not an attack on Teachers but just an easy target and I am sure others can add to this list. Look at education field. The majority of the employees work 180 day per year. Yes, half of the year while receiving (paid) days off during Christmas & Easter and all the other Mondays & Fridays while still receiving vacation. Some or the majority of government workers can roll-over unused vacation days and accumulate them for years and years. This allows the government worker to have a lump vacation payment at retirement which I believe increases their final year's wages and pension benefits. Firefighters & Police receive overtime pay to attend funerals. The sad thing about that is I always thought they were attending the funerals exclusively out of respect for their fellow employee. Firefighters work 2 or three consecutive days with 3 or four days off. Their off days are conveniently scheduled to work for another city and double the time and/or pension benefits. Police have similar employment schemes. City, County, State and Federal Administrators have countless assistants. Try to remember the last time you were in a public building while thinking these guys really work their a_ _es off. I could go on and on while I hope you get the picture.


There are many, many more situations going on and we must stop the molestation of public dollars and demand cut backs without eliminating public services first.

Start Now before there's no turning back

Home | Back