Quantcast
Home | Back

Schools debate how athletes make the grade

Share_email E-mail Story    |    Share_print Print Story    |    Comments    |   

 

By Colin McEwen

Record-Courier staff writer

How good should students’ grades be to play athletics? Is a ‘D’ average good enough? Should grade point averages matter at all? 

These are a few of the questions some Portage County school districts — and  residents of those districts — are asking.

Others just don’t bother. 

The state has required that students pass only five classes — meaning schools are only required to set a ‘D’ average for student/athlete achievement.

About half the districts in Portage County have set the same 1.0 grade-point average requirement, meeting the state guidelines. Although some districts are more strict about how many classes a student can fail and still meet that average.

At a recent Waterloo School Board meeting, board members discussed changes to its 1.0 grade point average requirement for students to participate in athletics. 

That discussion was met with controversy among board members and those in the audience. A healthy debate ensued online at recordpub.com.

Dennis Hopp, a Waterloo Board of Education member, challenged the district’s low requirement. He proposed teachers get together with administration officials to raise the GPA requirement for student-athletes. 

“Playing sports is a privilege,” he said. “Our first job in schools should be education. When we tell people that 1.0 is good enough, we’re not sending a good message and we’re not setting the bar high enough.” 

Hopp cited research from the United States Sports Academy that shows as requirements are raised, students usually raise their grades along to meet the standards. 

When schools raise GPA levels, students also raised their GPAs.

“I really believe that if we raise the average, we are raising the bar for the students,” he said. “I know that once we raise the expectations of students, they will meet them.”

Hopp said the GPA in his district should be at least a 2.0.

“If we raised it to a 1.5, it’s way too low but at least we would send a message that grades should come first,” he added. “I believe my role as board member is to set higher expectations for our students. When we raise those expectations, our students will meet that.”

The Ravenna School District’s sets its bar at 1.0 — or a ‘D’ average. So does Kent.

“Some people want it higher, some people say its too high,” said Ravenna Superintendent Tim Calfee. “Its not been an issue in the eight years I’ve been here.”

In Kent, if students don’t meet a 2.0 they must attend two hours of supervised study per week. However, students will still be able to participate until they dip below a 1.0 GPA.

Kent Schools Athletic Director Ernie Rutzky said “Our board of education has established a minimum GPA that allows students to continue to participate if they work to improve their academic performances.”

Other schools in the county, set the required GPA slightly higher than the state requirement.

The requirement in Crestwood is a 1.5 — the same with Aurora, Streetsboro, Rootstown and Southeast.

“I would rather have higher expectations than lower,” said Crestwood High School principal Arden Sommers who added that students must attend special study sessions when their GPA drops below a 2.0. “You have to set high expectations in everything for young people.”

In the Southeast schools, students must maintain a 1.5 GPA, or face disqualification from participating in athletics, Superintendent Tom Harrison said. He also said students must pass all of their classes.

The district with the highest requirement is Field with a 1.7 GPA.

Field Superintendent David Brobeck said his district has a “unique policy.” The district’s GPA level must be at a 1.7 or higher, or the students are placed on academic probation. “And they have three weeks to bring up their grades. If they don’t they lose eligibility,” he said.

Hopp, a former professor of engineering at the University of Akron and the Ohio State University, said he knows the students in Waterloo can achieve higher than a 1.0 GPA.

“People ask me if I think I am an expert,” he said. “I just know what it takes to succeed.”

 




Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. Recordpub.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Login above or Register to comment.
Jump to Page: 1 2
   Next 10 Comments of 19 Total Comments
19.
    Posted by maples001 October 6, 2009
Dm3745- You said it best. What is wrong with the parents setting a GPA to play sports? If our son comes home with anything less than a A - B average then we go to the teacher to find out what we can do as a family to help our child. At that time Sports would be at the bottom of the list and he would sit on the bench cheering for his team. To us Sports is a privilege, No. 2 to grades. Come on parents, blame the school board all you want- set your own rules.

School board- Times are changing so that means you need to be ready to keep up. Keep a open mind during these meetings. Seems to me that no matter what comes out of one person's mouth it will be shot down ASAP. In life we never agree with everyone however someone new can have a new outlook.

Who is important at our school- Oh yea THE KIDS !

After reading all of these blogs, I will be there thursday night.

18.
    Posted by vikings11_9 October 1, 2009
Seems like a no brainer - I have literally heard two people (not just in this blog) truly believe in a 1.0 GPA for athletes.

So I ask any school district currently at this level - what is the issue with raising the bar? Its time you take a look at this and raise the standards. Lets make Portage County schools leaders and not a followers.

17.
    Posted by Airbo September 28, 2009
DoWhatsRight, are you serious? Sheesh... You know, you only reach what you aim for... Keep the standards low and some kids will only push themselves enough to pass by the skin of their teeth. Other kids will always do their best, study their butts off, get straight A's and participate in sports (some are even star players and honor students at the same time). The bar is set so low right now it's almost as if just showing up to school is good enough. Like showing up to a job you don't love and goofing off all day, annoying the rest of the staff that has to pick up your slack. Instill good work ethics in them when they are young, and it will pay back in dividends not just for that child, but for the whole of society.

16.
    Posted by DoWhatsRight September 28, 2009
What about the theory that playing a sport is all that keeps these kids in school? Even if they only get a D, it is better than hanging out on the street corner and not going to school at all.

What about those kids that get a high GPA because their parents are on the school board or heads the PTA?

15.
    Posted by user1 September 27, 2009
Amen dm3745! Your children probably excelled in the sports in which they chose to participate because they applied the same principle of doing the maximum to succeed not the minimum!

14.
    Posted by loveslife September 27, 2009
Just because there is a minimum GPA set by a school system, that does not mean that parents cannot hold their children to a higher standard. Our boys knew that if they came home with anything less than A's or B's, then their athletic participation was over. We started this when they were in Little League. I'm not saying that A's and B's have to be the standard in every household. Parents know their children's capabilities. Our sons played sports year 'round, graduated from college and both lead happy, successful, and productive lives. Again parents.......set the standards for your own children above the minimum!!

13.
    Posted by RBD September 27, 2009
Asking students to maintain a 1.0 or a 1.5 gpa is not that hard to ask. As previous posters have said, there is help made available many times for strugging student-athletes.

The sad part is that many times, even with that low of a gpa requirement, student athletes get their share of breaks as well from administrators who over-ride teachers' grades so a student can participate.

12.
    Posted by Airbo September 27, 2009
On the note of students with crappy grades being surgeons, the commenter may have been thinking about the old joke:
What do you call the guy graduating at the bottom of his medical school class? Doctor...

11.
    Posted by genewilliams401 September 27, 2009
I agree, but the point is, sports shouldnt be the main incentive for a student to excell. If a student with the threat of disqualification still fails to meet the standards it's a sympton of an underlying problem that needs to be addressed by the parents and school to try to help the student achieve what is expected to graduate and be productive. Dumping them from a sports team and just forgetting about them is hardly the answer.
I agree there are great teachers, and there are also teachers who are not so great, just like any other profession.
To generalise that all teachers are great is a misconception, just as saying any failing or struggling student is just not trying. I'm just saying struggling students need the cooperation of school and parents to achieve the most that they can according to their ability. and dropping them from a sports team and forgetting about them is hardly the answer.
By the way, of course a 1.0 student would never be a surgeon nor would a 2.0. I really don't get that comment

10.
    Posted by bereasonable September 27, 2009
Sports are great and a necessary extra curicular. But that is just it, an extra curicular. Education is the main reason for going to school. An EXTREMELY small number of students will end up making a living in sports. A very small number out of each graduating class will get a scholarship because of sports and even then if they can't keep their grades up in college, they drop out. We are educating our kids to become productive members of society that will be abl to support themselves and maybe a family. Is a 1.0 going to be good enough to do that? I believe that we raise the bar and the students who don't meet the higher grade point average has help avaiable to them. We can't just kick them aside and throw them off the team without offering other options. if they and their parents don't take those other options such as a mandatory study sessions or tutoring to get then back on track, then there is no other alternative but to remove them from the team, but it was there choice and they could have (with their parents) made a different one. Parents,coaches, and the school should work together in these expectations. There are two things to keep in mind: You usually get only what you expect and you only get out of something what you put into it. If they want to play bad enough they will meet the requirements, if they struggle to do so, the school should offer assistance, if they choose not to, they SHOULD be removed from the sport. If they make these choices, there should be a parent there making the RIGHT choice with the student and therefore the choice to quit or not work on their grades should never happen. Maybe you would like a 1.0 surgen to operate on you????? And don't try to blame it on a student who has issues with learning, the school system is there to help. Most of these students have these grades because they don't do there work, NOT because they struggle in school. There are great teachers there to help them or parents, if they ask.

   Next 10 Comments | Home | Back