|
Last year, the Ohio Supreme Court pooh-poohed silly city ordinances such as fining people for failure to remove snow from private property. I understand it is unlawful to punish Ohio citizens for such petty violations. However, Kent’s service director, Gene Roberts, wants taxpayers in our town to be fined $100 to $300 if refusing, or unable, to remove said snow. I ask: What pleasure could Roberts derive from picking on the very people who pay his outrageous salary and put food on his table? Could this be, as Yogi Berra said, “Deja vu all over again” — our annual pre-winter empty threats from Kent City Hall? Personally, after mailing this letter, I’m going to grease my snow shovel — if I can stop shaking from fear long enough. Paul Craven Kent (Editor’s note: Kent City Council recently approved a new section in the city’s codified ordinance to create a civil offense when a property owner or snow plow contractor clears a driveway or parking lot but blocks a sidewalk or pedestrian crossing in the process. Violating the new ordinance can lead to an initial fine of $100 that could escalate to $300.) e
Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed.
Recordpub.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.
Login above or Register to comment. 9 Total Comments
Home | Back |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright Record Publishing Co, LLC. 1995-2010. All Rights Reserved.
Content may not be republished without the expressed written consent of the publisher. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||