Quantcast
Home | Back

$200 million in renovations eyed for KSU

Share_email E-mail Story    |    Share_print Print Story    |    Comments    |   

 

By Matt Fredmonsky

Record-Courier staff writer

The most comprehensive facelift Kent State University’s main campus has seen in nearly 40 years could be under way in early 2010 at a cost of nearly $200 million.

The KSU Board of Trustees voted Tuesday to approve the issuance of up to $200 million in general receipt bonds to construct new buildings and renovate many of the existing facilities on the Kent campus.

KSU President Lester Lefton said the plan so far prioritizes issues on campus by focusing on health and safety first before addressing the “student experience” and, finally, aesthetics.

“Now’s the time to do it,” Lefton said. “The bond market is the most favorable bond market we’ve seen in recent history.”

No final decisions have yet been made on what buildings will be constructed where or which labs will be first on the list for infrastructure and technological upgrades. But the plan calls solely for work on academic and office facilities and excludes dormitories.

Trustees could vote in early 2010 on a more specific facilities plan for the campus, Lefton said.

“Which would be much more detailed saying we would build this, knock this down ... and know exactly how much it will all cost,” he said.

Lefton said the plan to renovate much of the Kent campus was included in an analysis conducted by an outside firm to address deferred maintenance issues and capital improvements over the university’s entire eight-campus system. The estimated cost to update the regional and Kent campuses is a combined $353 million.

However, tops on the list for new construction and renovation in Kent is likely a new facility for the recently created College of Public Health. The plan also calls for immediate action on the existing art, architecture and science buildings, Lefton said.

“But those are not the only priorities,” he said.

Lefton said the nature of the bond market essentially requires immediate action, but the construction efforts are expected to be under way in various capacities for the next three to five years. 

Aside from the bonds, additional funding for the capital improvements and renovations is expected to come from a fee charged to students.

Patrick Mullin, chairman of the university’s trustee board, said the fee associated with the construction and renovation would likely be a new fee implemented on incoming freshmen.

“My gut tells me it would probably be a new fee,” he said.

Mullin said the last campus-wide construction effort on as large a scale took place in the late 1960s. He added the university trustees have been discussing this plan for several years.

Mullin said the next step is for the university to begin the design phase, choose buildings for renovation and approach the bond market in January for funding.

“This has been very high on our agenda,” he said. “We are certainly just beginning down this path.” 

 




Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. Recordpub.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Login above or Register to comment.
 10 Total Comments
10.
    Posted by AndrewP November 18, 2009
You mentioned Satterfield twice, ksu, but from what I recall, that building could use some help. I know for a fact that Van Deusen needs help. as does Bowman.

And as part of the Risman Plaza renovation, they're going to tear out the fountain for...more concrete!

Lefton is a moron!

9.
    Posted by RETIRED GUY November 18, 2009
More money spent and more reason to justify an increase infees and tuition.

8.
    Posted by Fair Tax 1 November 18, 2009
All in all I think this is a good thing for the university and the city. The university gets some new buildings and renovations on some old buildings. The city gets a spike in income taxes from construction workers on the projects and other economic benefits, such as lunch at local restuarants and 24's for the ride home.

Gary - the core compentency of the university is providing an education, not providing a bed. I think the university is pretty clear on this otherwise small group would still be standing and students residing in those dorms.

7.
    Posted by ksu323 November 18, 2009
It's more than three buildings. I had lunch with Lester Lefton last week. He said it would probably include include Satterfield, Bowman, Van Deusen, Satterfield, Art Building, Art Annex, Williams, Cunningham and Smith. I'm sure I forgot a building or two in there.

6.
    Posted by misstia November 18, 2009
i DID read the article and yes, that's 3 buildings...what about the other neglected academic buildings???? there's more than 3...

and dorms are needed because they have students living in lounges....there are more upper class students living on campus now than ever before....

over on akron news now someone called lefton 'loot' and i think that names suits him perfectly.....he's looting the state, he's looting the students and he's looting kent state....can't wait for his term to be OVA!

5.
    Posted by s.swenson November 18, 2009
So quick to just charge more fees? The cost of college is contributing the the downfall of middle class Americans! When education becomes unobtainable due to cost if has a trickle down effect. Enough with the fee's already it's getting so crazy.

4.
    Posted by ksu323 November 18, 2009
Hey Gary hardly anyone wants to live on campus, If KSU didn't have freshman live on campus in their freshman year, there wouldn't be a problem. I know most (if not all) universities follow this practice.

Misstia,
Did you read the article? "The plan also calls for immediate action on the existing art, architecture and science buildings, Lefton said."
Before criticizing, try reading the article.

Go President Lefton!!

3.
    Posted by billshane342 November 18, 2009
How about building downtown?
The city will have a new county court house without city money, so why not a couple STATE campus buildings too?

KSU is ever changing. That is good.

Hey fella, they do have new dorms, with more in the planning. Tearing down small group, before there was enough housing just makes sure there is a real need for new dorms. See the plan son?

2.
    Posted by misstia November 18, 2009
lefton is one of the worst presidents at ksu ever....this is ridiculous....there needs to be a parking garage on ksu's campus, not one they want the city to build on city land....there needs to be more dorms....and some academic buildings have been neglected for years and he wants a new building for the public health program that is brand new???

1.
    Posted by Gary November 18, 2009
Oh great build more buildings but no new dorms--do you expect the new students to live in lounges for their 4+ years at KSU?????

Home | Back