Home | Back

Obama demands health care vote

Share_print Print Story    |    Comments    |   

 

 

By Alan Fram

Associated Press

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama urged Congress Wednesday to vote “up or down” on sweeping health care legislation in the next few weeks, endorsing a plan that denies Senate Republicans the right to kill the bill by stalling with a filibuster.

“I don’t see how another year of negotiations would help. Moreover, the insurance companies aren’t starting over,” Obama said, rejecting Republican calls to begin anew on an effort to remake the health care system.

The president made his appeal as Democratic leaders in Congress surveyed their rank and file for the votes needed to pass legislation by majority vote — invoking rules that deny Senate Republicans the right to block it through endless stalling debate. Obama specifically endorsed that approach.

The outcome will affect nearly every American, either making major changes in the ways they receive and pay for health care or leaving current systems in place. There is still no certainty about the final result in Congress — or even that Democrats will agree to the series of changes that Obama said he was including as Republican contributions.

GOP leaders were unmoved.

The Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, said a decision by Democrats to invoke rules that bar filibusters would be “met with outrage” by the public, and he said Obama was pushing a sweeping bill that voters don’t want.

“They’ve had enough of this yearlong effort to get a win for the Democratic Party at any price to the American people,” McConnell said on the Senate floor.

At its core, Obama’s proposal would extend health care to tens of millions of uninsured Americans while cracking down on insurance company practices such as denying coverage on the basis of a pre-existing medical condition.

With his remarks, delivered at the White House, Obama took the lead in a bid by congressional Democrats to mount a party-line rescue mission for the health care legislation that appeared on the cusp of passage late last year, only to be derailed when Republicans won a Massachusetts Senate seat that gave them the ability to block it.

Obama’s remarks were replete with criticism of the insurance industry as well as dismissive asides about GOP critics.

Insurers are “continuing to raise premiums and deny coverage. For us to start over now could simply lead to delay that could last for another decade or more,” he said.

As for calls for additional debate, he said that in the year since he inaugurated his campaign for health care changes, “every idea has been put on the table. Every argument has been made.”

“Everything there is to say about health care has been said, and just about everyone has said it,” Obama said as murmurs of laughter swept through his receptive audience of invited guests in the White House East Room.

The president’s appearance appeared part of an endgame strategy put in motion last week, when Obama presided over a bipartisan summit meeting with leaders of both parties and both houses. After seven hours of discussion, he said he had heard ideas for changes from sides, and he signaled that the time may have come for Democrats to proceed on their own if GOP critics were not ready to join them.

While his spokesmen and Democratic congressional leaders joined in calls for an up-or-down vote — a simple majority, no filibusters allowed — the White House announced with fanfare on Tuesday he was asking lawmakers to incorporate four GOP suggestions.

Obama said he was exploring GOP proposals for cracking down on fraudulent medical charges, revamping ways to resolve malpractice disputes, boosting doctors’ Medicaid reimbursements and offering tax incentives to curb unnecessary patient visits to doctors.

The ideas included an experiment that would establish special courts in which judges with medical expertise would decide malpractice allegations. The idea has been criticized by the Center for Justice & Democracy, a consumer group that prefers the current system of awarding damages. It said health courts would be “anti-patient.”

In a speech that reprised many of the points he has made in the past year, Obama cast the battle over health care as something more.

“At stake right now is not just our ability to solve this problem, but our ability to solve any problem. The American people want to know it is still possible for Washington to look out for their interests and their future. They are waiting for us to act.”

“They are waiting for us to lead. And as long as I hold this office, I intend to provide that leadership.”

Immediately after Obama finished speaking, the White House made good on his promise to “do everything in my power to make the case for reform,” saying he would travel to Pennsylvania on Monday and to Missouri next Wednesday to press the issue.

 




Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. Recordpub.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Login above or Register to comment.
Jump to Page: 1 2 3
   Next 10 Comments of 26 Total Comments
26.
    Posted by my57chevy2door1 March 5, 2010
Im sorry but terrorist Obama Doesn't care about health care anymore than he cares about jobs in America. He doesn't care about our economy nor the people of this country.. The only reason he's saying anything about our health care system is to take our minds off the fact he's pumping millions and millions of our hard earned dollars over to his family and buddies over in that giant litterbox in the middle east where we buy our oil from. Because if he "truly" cared about our nation he would tell the oil companies that they need to stop raising the gas prices 30 cents a gallon because a butterfly landed on a rare tree in California or that it rained in Florida at lunchtime or because the economy "showed" signs of a gain

25.
    Posted by averagejoe5 March 4, 2010
All this new bill does is enrich pharma and the healthcare ins companies. It is no different than what we have now. If you have a pre-existing condition you pay a higher premium, so yeah you can go broke. You can do that now. Everyone can get ins. now, there will be no difference in the cost. There will still be deductibles. This will not be free and will eventually become more expensive. Also instead of 52M uncovered Americans we will still have 19M uncovered Americans. Who will they be? What will happen to them? This is a hollow shell of the original bill that Obama promised. WHere is the public option? It isn't there because Big Ins did want it there. They want to control the premium. This is going to be just like the recent "Pay/Go" bill etc. We have no leadership in Wsahington on the Dem or Rep side. This is a sham and the middle class again are going to foot the bill. It is nothing more than a new expanded welfare system. Go ahead and root for it. Make sure you read it first.

24.
    Posted by DoWhatsRight March 4, 2010
SweetDee

Good post you are at least addressed the subject, and not the other posters. However, you did look at the bill with the concept that it will make it so I will not go broke paying if I or someone in my family gets sick. That is you think what the health care bill will do for me. Under this bill you may well go broke paying the premiums without getting sick.

Then you say because it does not affect me personally. Doesn't mean I should not support it. What if it cost you your job, or a family, or a friend their job? It would not affect you personally. Would you still support it? There is a cost to business based on the size of the payroll and the number of employees. Business will reduce the payroll in order to cut the taxes. Would you support that? There is a monthly fee attached to the premium to pay for abortion. Would you support that? So you see, no matter how you look at it, it still comes down to what will the bill do for me? (Perhaps I should also have included, "to me.)

As for no one expecting to get the insurance free, there most certainly are a number of people that expect it. In fact, to be sure everyone is insured the taxpayer may have to pay for those that have no jobs and no income other than family assistance. These are usually the people that need the insurance the most. Read the bill and you will see this is not the Health Care reform we need. It creates more cost and problems than it solves

23.
    Posted by SweetDee March 4, 2010
DoWhatsRight:

Come on, be sensible. No reasonable person expects to get health care for free. What I do expect is that if I get sick or someone in my family gets sick, I won't go broke paying for it.

Furthermore, just because something doesn't affect me personally doesn't mean I can't or shouldn't support it. Although I do believe that this health care reform bill will benefit most people.

22.
    Posted by DoWhatsRight March 4, 2010
I see nothing but what I think the Health Bill will do for me in all of these posts. I have read two of the Health Care Bills and I would not vote for them. The reason I will not go into here, because the facts mean nothing to those that think they will be getting Health Care free or for less. You will not, believe me.

Just read the bill in private and ask yourself, how will this affect me? If you do this I would be willing to bet that you would not vote for it either. Do we need reform, Hell yes? Take the problems in our Health Care one at a time and fix it. No earmarks, no bribes, just fix the problem. They will not do that because they can not hide all their earmarks that way.

21.
    Posted by Fair Tax 1 March 4, 2010
KS I will take Warren Buffetts opinion over some dime a dozen economist any day!!!

Heck he is on board but knows that its a weak bill.

"But while Buffett, the chairman and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, applauded Obama for taking up the reform effort, he said that "unfortunately, we came up with a bill that really doesn't attack the cost situation that much."


Asked if he would be in favor of scrapping the Senate health care bill, Buffett responded: "I would be."


If the president were to start over, Buffett would advise him to "just show this chart of what's been happening and say this is the tapeworm that's eating at American competitiveness. And I would say that one way or another, we're going to attack costs, costs, costs, just like they talk about jobs, jobs, jobs.""



Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/33693.html#ixzz0hES1TLxT

20.
    Posted by Uknown March 4, 2010
Fair Tax wrote:

"I read that piece and did not see anywhere that the bill is going to reign in doctor and medical service provider's cost increases."

That's probably because you go to a "special interest" to get your eyes examined, instead of to an eye doctor, like a normal person!

19.
    Posted by Fair Tax 1 March 4, 2010
So when are you liberals going to start villianizing Bart Stupak? He said he and his group will not vote for this bill based on their principles.

I read that piece and did not see anywhere that the bill is going to reign in doctor and medical service provider's cost increases.

18.
    Posted by Uknown March 4, 2010
You can listen to "Fair Tax" or you can read this:

A Milestone in the Health Care Journey
by Ron Brownstein

When I reached Jonathan Gruber on Thursday, he was working his way, page by laborious page, through the mammoth health care bill Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid had unveiled just a few hours earlier. Gruber is a leading health economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who is consulted by politicians in both parties. He was one of almost two dozen top economists who sent President Obama a letter earlier this month insisting that reform won't succeed unless it "bends the curve" in the long-term growth of health care costs. And, on that front, Gruber likes what he sees in the Reid proposal. Actually he likes it a lot.

"I'm sort of a known skeptic on this stuff," Gruber told me. "My summary is it's really hard to figure out how to bend the cost curve, but I can't think of a thing to try that they didn't try. They really make the best effort anyone has ever made. Everything is in here....I can't think of anything I'd do that they are not doing in the bill. You couldn't have done better than they are doing." Gruber may be especially effusive. But the Senate blueprint, which faces its first votes tonight, also is winning praise from other leading health reformers like Mark McClellan, the former director of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services under George W. Bush and Len Nichols, health policy director at the centrist New America Foundation. "The bottom line," Nichols says, "is the legislation is sending a signal that business as usual [in the medical system] is going to end."

To read more:

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2009/11/a-milestone-in-the-health-care-journey/30619/

   Next 10 Comments | Home | Back