Quantcast
Sat Oct 11 2008 4:12 AM
Email:   Password:     |  Register/Subscribe
Search Site:
Advanced
Search
  Archive

FREE Sample
PDF Edition
The Record Courier
Newspaper Subscriptions

USA Weekend

Home | Back

OUR VIEW: A real fight: Dems, Bush at odds over add-ons in measure to provide funding for war

Email To A Friend
Printer Friendly
Comments
Add to Reddit Add to Digg Add to del.icio.us

Congressional Democrats are heading toward another confrontation with President Bush and this time they're hoping they might finally win one. Don't bet on it.
Bush sent to Congress a request for $108 billion to continue fighting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan for this current year. He said he would veto any bill that exceeded his spending request, contained a timetable for pulling out of Iraq or contained new domestic spending programs.
The war funding measure, as it stands, contains all three of those veto-provoking elements.
It calls for $178 billion in spending, although some Republicans say the final tab is more like $200 billion. It does contain additional spending to continue fighting the wars in the first few months of 2009, a provision Bush might sit still for.
But it calls for $16 billion in extended unemployment benefits for workers who have exhausted theirs and it also calls for doubling of college aid for veterans. The Democrats are betting that Bush will shy away from being seen to stiff both veterans and the unemployed.
The bill also calls for a significant withdrawal of U.S. troops by December 2009. This would give antiwar Democrats a chance to go on the record, but the Senate Republicans are likely to block the timetable before it gets to Bush.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., pulled the bill from the schedule Wednesday night after conservative-to-moderate "Blue Dog" Democrats revolted over Democratic leaders' insistence on including the unrelated provision to sharply increase education benefits for veterans under the GI Bill.
The new GI Bill " designed to give Iraq war veterans enough help to finance a four-year stint at a public college " would cost $51 billion over 10 years. It runs afoul of a rule designed to prevent new benefit programs from causing the deficit to spiral.
The Democratic rebels are the House's top supporters of "pay as you go" budget rules that require that new benefit programs be financed with offsetting spending cuts or new taxes so as not to cause the budget deficit to increase.
All this spending is basically borrowed money; the cost goes straight to the deficit, which majority Democrats " like the Republicans in power before them " apparently have no problem ignoring.
This should be the last war-funding bill of Bush's presidency. It promises to be a real fight.




Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. Recordpub.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Login above or Register to comment.
 0 Total Comments

Terms of Service Copyright Record Publishing Co, LLC. 1995-2008. All Rights Reserved.
Content may not be republished without the expressed written consent of the publisher.
Dix Communications