Home | Back

What now for healthcare? Better business models

Email To A Friend
Printer Friendly
Comments
Add to Reddit Add to Digg Add to del.icio.us

By David Stern

The fight over healthcare is entering a new round. Most Americans agree that we need more affordable insurance and coverage of pre-existing conditions. With Scott Brown's victory in the special election for the late Sen. Ted Kennedy's Massachusetts seat, Washington's political order has been revamped. Accordingly, debate on how to provide these benefits and otherwise improve the system has begun anew.

Whenever something more on healthcare happens in Congress"and whatever it is"it should result from a more business-like approach. To date, reform has been a one-size-fits-all, one-shot deal, trying to be everything to everybody. In contrast, corporate entities launch products and services based on extensive research of what the market will bear. New offerings serve a targeted customer base. Marketers anticipate that even their latest products might need to be improved quickly to meet the market's needs cost-effectively.

While there is no easy answer for healthcare, a simple business principle can be followed: "leave no stone unturned." Every opportunity to control Medicare and Medicaid expenses while maintaining quality care needs to be pursued. Even the most ardent opponents of reform agree with that.

No one wants to decrease caregiver-patient interaction. Or prevent anyone from receiving the medical tests, hospital stays, or treatments they need. Rather, the focus should be on healthcare administration, to reduce the cost of facilitating these.

For example, Comerica Bank recently unveiled electronic payment processing capabilities for healthcare providers. The bank estimates that nearly one third of every healthcare dollar is spent on paperwork and other labor-intensive administrative costs.

Another sure route to savings the healthcare industry can follow: local outsourcing. Hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and other healthcare operations can find others to do jobs for them outside the purview of healthcare services.

According to a Modern Healthcare magazine survey, contracting for accounts-receivable functions has recently spiked. Big savings are also realized by outsourcing laundry, housekeeping, clinical equipment maintenance, emergency department and foreign-language-training staff, and call centers.

Individually, new cost controls need not be earth-shattering. Shifts that save individual providers thousands of dollars per year can add up to hundreds of millions or billions throughout the nation. Good targets are custodial services, purchasing, patient-care and medical/surgical supplies, and cafeterias. Disposable foam mattresses, for instance, can be almost entirely replaced with permanent waterproof mattresses. At Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital, Portland, Ore., this decision paid for itself in just one year with about $81,000 in savings.

Taking stock of personal-care items provided to patients (aspirin packets, tissues, shampoo, diapers, baby wipes) helps, too. Often, they don't use all of these, and when they check out, leftovers are trashed. At Butterworth Hospital, Grand Rapids, Mich., following infection control guidelines, nursing staff now evaluates these. This has saved an estimated $30,000 per year.

Outsourcing laundry produces more substantial savings. It's also better for the environment. Outside commercial operations that wash linen and garments use natural resources most efficiently. We offer huge economies of scale in production because we have a large client base. Compared with hospital-operated standalone linen washrooms, our high-capacity machinery does a far better job of conserving water, energy, chemistry, and other supplies.

Relatively speaking, waste reduction and outsourcing are small steps in a long trek. But they are no less necessary. The healthcare industry needs more of every flavor of fundamental business ingenuity, such as subjecting all kinds of contracts to competitive bidding. Dramatically streamlining administration is probably America's best shot at providing truly cost-effective care.

Congress can help by encouraging more attention to the little things. As a taxpayer, I just wish our Representatives and Senators would make better use of the present healthcare debate by spending as much time looking for ways to save as to how to spend.

David Stern is president and CEO of Paris Healthcare Linen Services, which serves Northeast Ohio from Ravenna.






Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. Recordpub.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Login above or Register to comment.
 5 Total Comments
5.
    Posted by grannybee February 14, 2010
I agree with the ER to many people use it for none er care Come on people see your Dr for a head ach or a scratch on your finger

4.
    Posted by stryker January 28, 2010
I think most of it is common sense. Going to the ER because you have a headache or cold is stupid. Go to a minute clinic or to your doctor. I was at the Akron General ER back in December with severe pain from kidney stones and that place was packed. You couldn't get a room for 2 hours. There were people in there that was clearly not suppose to be there. The ER is what it is supposed to be used for emergencies only.

3.
    Posted by shagbark January 27, 2010
I would not call individual and lawyer greed as corporate.

Also, malpractice need to be capped in all cases, even where death occurs. This includes pain/suffering/and multipliers. Human life is priceless. Given that, no amount of money will make the difference. Only greed.

Absolutely agree on the ER visits. But then again, the ERs cannot turn anyone away because of previous law suits, even if the person cannot pay or is not seriously ill.

A large part of the medication price in this country is the cost of malpractice insurance. Caps on malpractice insurance in this country would go along way to reduce costs. Also, get the FDA to streamline its expensive approval process.

2.
    Posted by CmdrKJon January 27, 2010
Educating the public would help a lot as well. There are too many people, with and without insurance who run to the ER with issues that could more easily treated with an office call or visit to the clinic.

Yes, corporate greed has driven up the cost of healthcare insurance, but it is not the only factor. If little Susie has a runny nose, visit a clinic, make a Dr.'s appointment. I have seen people in the ER for a boil. We need to educate the consumer.

If there is going to be some sort of healthcare reform, it would need to be all inclusive. If healthcare insurance becomes mandatory, the costs need to be capped. Malpractice awards need to be capped in all but cases where death occurs. The cost of prescriptions need to be capped as well. The average American cannot afford $125 per month per perscription. If they can afford to sell in at a lesser cost in other countries, they can do the same here.

1.
    Posted by shagbark January 27, 2010
The thinking in this Statement is flawed:

Taking stock of personal-care items provided to patients (aspirin packets, tissues, shampoo, diapers, baby wipes) helps, too. Often, they don't use all of these, and when they check out, leftovers are trashed. At Butterworth Hospital, Grand Rapids, Mich., following infection control guidelines, nursing staff now evaluates these. This has saved an estimated $30,000 per year.

This items are deemed to be tampered with and if anything happens to the second user, a massive lawsuit will result... quickly wipes out any savings, the career of the nursing staff, increases insurances costs, etc..

We need tort reform for this to work!!