Heading Logo

Our View: School funding figures don't add up

Kasich's sales pitch at odds with figures released by state

Published: February 8, 2013 4:00 AM

This isn't hard to figure

out," Gov. John Kasich said last week as he unveiled his school funding plan, "If you are poor, you're going to get more. If you are rich, you are going to get less."

Sorry, Governor, maybe we're missing something in the translation, but it doesn't seem to be working that way. At least not in Portage County.

According to the figures released Wednesday, only four Portage County school districts are set to receive increases in state funding in the next fiscal year. Among them is Aurora, which is set to receive a boost of $457,311, an increase of 16 percent in state support.

Those receiving no increases in funding include the Windham, Waterloo and Southeast districts.

[Article continues below]

The governor's assurances notwithstanding, it is hard to figure out why Aurora, the wealthiest community in Portage County, stands to receive more state funding while Windham, Waterloo and Southeast, which all have limited tax bases and have struggled financially, evidently will have to "make do" with the status quo.

Kasich's school funding plan includes an equalization provision that would enable districts with modest resources to take in as much from their first 20 mills of property tax as wealthier districts that have $250,000 of property value per student. The conventional wisdom was that this would result in a Robin Hood-style shifting of state support from wealthier districts to those less well off. That doesn't appear to be the case.

Spokespeople for the governor's office said Wednesday that the distribution of state funding is tied to changes in property valuation and enrollment, and the state has seen significant shifts in those areas in the past five years. The economic downturn of 2008 depressed suburban property values, while development in rural areas, where the oil and gas industry has been active, has boosted the value of farmland.

Even taking that into consideration, however, it is difficult to understand the rationale for the school funding figures.

We can take comfort in not being alone on this. State Sen. Tom Sawyer, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Education Committee, observed, "I don't understand how a wealthy Columbus suburban school district can receive a 331 percent increase while many rural districts across Ohio get nothing. It doesn't make sense. The governor needs to explain why these numbers contradict the sales pitch he gave school leaders last week."

Some clarification would help, Governor.

Rate this article

Do you want to leave a comment?   Please Log In or Register to comment.

anonymous Feb 8, 2013 8:45 AM

If the Record Courier would improve its reporting then its editors could see that the PER PUPIL money from the state is MUCH LOWER to the rich districts like Aurora. The Record Courier should be reporting PER PUPIL funding, not TOTAL funding. The newspaper can't understand its own coverage.