from northern Ohio, including Portage County Commissioner Kathleen Chandler, are voicing concerns about the use of revenues Gov. John Kasich's plan for the Ohio Turnpike is expected to generate.
Specifically, they are seeking legislative guarantees that most of the proceeds will be used for infrastructure improvements north of U.S. 30 and that local commuters who use the Turnpike on a daily basis won't be subject to increasing tolls.
Their rationale is that the turnpike, which runs east-west from the Pennsylvania to Indiana borders, is a northern Ohio highway and that the revenues Kasich is projecting ought to be used in the region where the tolls have been paid rather than being used for improvements throughout the state.
Kasich's plan for the Turnpike calls for the state to borrow about $1.5 billion, through bonds issued against future tolls, to pay for infrastructure improvements. The governor says the $1.5 billion could leverage a matching amount in local and federal funding.
Lorain County Commissioner Ted Calo, who testfied Tuesday before the Ohio House Finance Committee, noted that the governor has given assurances that the Turnpike is not going to be sold or privatized, that workers will not be laid off and that proceeds from any bonds issued against the highway would be kept in northern Ohio. However, without legislation specifying how revenues are to be distributed, "there will be no way to ensure that promises are kept after the money changes hands," he said. The governor's word alone isn't law.
Chandler, a former state legislator who returned to the commissioners' office in January, co-signed Calo's testimony. Two Turnpike exits are located in Portage County.
The northern Ohio officials raise a valid point. If Kasich's plan generates the revenue he projects, a great deal of money will be generated for road and bridge work.
Northern Ohio travelers -- including commuters -- have been paying tolls for the Turnpike since 1955. This region ought to be the primary beneficiary of the revenues generated. A legislative guarantee is a good idea.
While I am the last one to advocte another fee or tax from our government, I could justify expanding tolling to additional highways such as Rt 71, Rt 70, Rt 75 and perhaps others. This was handled similiar to the tolling system used in the Chicago area via the I-Pass system. The people who use the major highways would be the ones that are paying for the up keep of the highways. Reduce our propery or income taxes a corrisponding amount.
I agree the money should go to the northern part of Ohio. They are the ones that had to give up their land so they could build the turnpike. I further think that the money should not go to the cities like Cleveland. They have been collecting more than their fair share of state monies.
Actually selling the turnpike might be a very good idea. Autobahns, autostradas etc in Europe are all private and quite good and pleasurable to drive.
It is called the "Ohio Turnpike"...not the Northern Ohio Turnpike. It is not the northern counties cash cow...The revenue generated belong to all Ohioians... If Chandler had a problem with the Turnpike revenues, Chandler and her cronies should have done something when she was in Columbus...A good example of the entitlement attitude.