Heading Logo

U.S. overextended, time to pull back

Published: March 19, 2014 4:00 AM

There is a rather significant kerfuffle going on for direction of the Republican Party regarding foreign affairs.

On one side is the party establishment. Think of John McCain, George Bush, John Boehner and the like. These people tout a strong national defense. It is hard to argue against such wording until you realize that by "a strong national defense" they actually mean an obligation to police the world, "making it safe for democracy," I suppose.

The Republican establishment believes that spending American blood and treasure in pursuing endeavors such as Iraq and Afghanistan are really in America's interest. ... as is pushing NATO right up to the borders of Russia.

Challenging this assumption is the Rand Paul faction.

This movement claims that being the world's policeman is too expensive. Rand Paul asks why, for example, in 2012 the U.S. defense budget ($682 billion) was greater than the next 10 largest nations combined ($652 billion). It also questions why we have our military deployed in around 150 foreign countries with something like 900 overseas military bases. And then there are the countless "commitments" to defend other countries while getting little, if nothing, in return from them.

[Article continues below]

These numbers beg the question. Is all this really necessary for national defense, especially when the debt of the U.S. government is over $17 trillion, an amount that will burden generations of Americans come?

I think not. Count me in the Rand Paul camp. After the direct intervention disasters of Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya and behind the scenes meddling in Egypt and the Ukraine, the American public wants not isolationism, but to be more non-interventionist.

I feel that we are extended far beyond our resources. It's time for pulling back and stop feeling responsible for everything that happens in the world.

Peter Skurkiss, Stow

Rate this article

Do you want to leave a comment?   Please Log In or Register to comment.

little_r_republican Mar 19, 2014 12:07 PM

Since obama and kerry and others are so upset with Crimera voting to secede from the Ukraine...what will they do when Venice votes to secede from Italy? When Scotland votes to secede from the UK in November? Where were they when Catalonia seceded from Spain? Were they just looking for a bone to pick with Russia?

If obama really wanted to hurt Russs all he has to do is allow the Keystone pipeline, allow oil and gas exploration on public lands. In less than 5 years the US could be totally energy independant and exporting $billions worth of oil and gas. What you can absolutely certain of is that money is involved and flowing into obama's account of the democrat accounts. Some people think obama is just beholding to the greenie weenies. Nonesense...money is the only thing obama is beholding to.