Democracy can do better than dynasties

By Jonathan Zimmerman Los Angeles Times Published:

A few years ago, I found myself sitting on an airplane next to a gentleman from Egypt. Talk quickly turned to the upheaval in his country, where the so-called Arab Spring was in full bloom.

"We want a real democracy," he told me, "not like yours." When I pressed him to elaborate, he shot back with a question of his own. "How many times have you voted," he asked, "when someone named 'Bush' or 'Clinton' wasn't running?"

The answer, I sheepishly admitted, was once: in 2008. Before that _ going back to 1980, the first year I cast a ballot _ every single presidential ticket featured someone from one of those two families.

That's not good for our image overseas, or for our democracy at home. We tell the world that we're a land of opportunity, where anyone can grow up to be the president. Then we limit ourselves to a handful of political dynasties.

Lately, there's been a lot of talk of another Clinton versus Bush contest. With her huge fundraising apparatus and name recognition, Hillary Rodham Clinton is the hands-down Democratic front-runner for 2016. Meanwhile, Jeb Bush seems to be laying the groundwork to capture the GOP nomination.

Of course, neither Clinton nor Bush has announced any such plan. But the "super PAC" Ready for Hillary has already raised $4 million simply to "encourage" her to run. And Bush is canvassing the country like a presidential candidate.

Our sixth president, John Quincy Adams, was the son of our second one; Benjamin Harrison's grandfather William spent a very brief time in the White House half a century earlier; Franklin D. Roosevelt was preceded by Theodore, his distant cousin.

But we've never had a time when presidential politics is as dominated by a few select bloodlines. That limits the pool of eligible national leaders, which is bad enough. But it also makes it harder for them to govern once they get to the White House, where they must simultaneously demonstrate fealty to the family and independence from it.

Once he became president, George W. Bush also had to prove he was his own man. His invasion of Iraq was at least partially motivated by his father's refusal to occupy it during the Persian Gulf War. But it also appeared to be aimed at exacting revenge on Saddam Hussein, who had plotted to assassinate the elder Bush. "This is the guy who tried to kill my dad," Bush told a campaign rally, six months before the Iraq invasion.

And make no mistake, another Clinton presidency would be about family, too. One way or another, everything Hillary Clinton does will address her husband's legacy.

As for Jeb Bush, nobody will forget that he was governor of Florida when a highly controversial recount there catapulted his brother into the White House. Bush has said that he moved from Texas to Florida to "get out from (his) father's shadow."

Yet he'll never be able to escape it, or his brother's.

"Dynasty, shmynasty," Jeb Bush quipped in 2000, dismissing the concept. But at least one member of the family recognizes its dangers. "If we can't find more than two or three families to run for office, that's silly," Jeb's mother, Barbara, said in an interview in January. "The Kennedys, Clintons, Bushes -- there are just more families than that."

She's right. It's time to send a different one to the White House. That's what a real democracy would do.

___

ABOUT THE WRITER

Jonathan Zimmerman teaches history and education at New York University. His most recent book is "Small Wonder: The Little Red Schoolhouse in History and Memory."

Want to leave your comments?

Sign in or Register to comment.

  • redleg...we have ryan and brown because of the unions, especially the UAW.¬† clyde???? I don't know, clearly an airhead.

  • @writesomething....."Don't forget the gerrymandering of congressional districts that has diminished the value of votes to the Republicans benefit".

    If that statement is true, why is Ryan my congressman and Brown my Senator, Clyde as state rep.?

  • Don't forget the gerrymandering of congressional districts that has diminished the value of votes to the Republicans benefit.¬†Nothing like stacking the deck in your favor little r!¬†

  • The 17th amendment is at fault. So too the hugh pay, perks and special retirement and other benefits allow permanent politicians to stay in power as long as they can give away OPM to purchase votes to stay in power. mob democracy cannot ever work. We need to return to a republic with States having an equal say in congress.