Belatedly -- but, we hope, finally! -- we are witnessing the beginning of the end of the Carterization of Barack Obama's presidency.
It has come not a moment too soon. We can only hope that it is real and not too late.
President Obama is scrambling to halt a new genocide in which suddenly powerful Sunni Islamist fanatics are slaughtering victims simply because they are Christians or non-Muslim Yazidi sect members. And the reality of that led Obama to give at least two orders this month he probably thought he'd never give.
First, the president who proudly boasted that he'd withdrawn the last U.S. combat troops from Iraq reluctantly ordered U.S. warplanes back into the skies over northern Iraq. Their mission: bomb rampaging, genocide-bent Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (known as ISIS) that had taken over strongholds of Iraq's pro-western Kurds. Thousands of terrified families had fled and were trapped on Mount Sinjar. Some 100 U.S. civilian staff and military guards at the U.S. consulate in Erbil were also in danger.
Obama's announcement caused his perpetual critics the discomfort of actually liking something he'd done.
Yet, in the real world, commanders-in-chief eventually learn there are consequences for failing to do a job done when lives of women and children are at stake. So, while echoing the refrain of "no boots on the ground," Obama gave his second order: He dispatched 130 U.S. military "advisers" into Iraq to come up with a way of rescuing those potential victims of the ISIS genocide.
What Obama's military rescue mission shows is that yet another commander-in-chief has bowed to the reality that he cannot make good outcomes happen just by uttering wishful words.
Unfortunately, few world figures today are willing to boldly lead, simply because it's the right thing to do. Earlier this year, the world had warnings of ISIS' genocidal bent. News reported ISIS troops demanded Arab Christians convert to Islam or be killed. But the stories were often buried. World leaders shrugged and went about their daily grinds.
Now we are racing back into Iraq. Racing to save non-Muslim Arabs from being victims of a genocide we knew was about to happen but never cared enough to wake up the world and make it care.
We are racing urgently back, with no great plan in hand, because now we cannot permit Iraq to disintegrate into global jihad's next haven.
While the world gets it when we talk about a president's Carterization -- it's Jimmy Carter's image as a flawed leader swept along by events -- there is a larger lesson the world overlooks.
While Jimmy Carter indeed seemed powerless after Iranian revolutionaries held his U.S. embassy staff in Iran hostage, Carter also accomplished one of the boldest leadership achievements of any president. Carter's Camp David summit and his unscripted personal shuttle diplomacy produced an Israeli-Egyptian peace that endures in that tumultuous region.
A bold, courageous personal presidential involvement -- a roll up your sleeves and quit fretting about legacy images effort -- may once again be what that exploding region and the world need right now.
ABOUT THE WRITER
Martin Schram, an op-ed columnist for McClatchy-Tribune, is a veteran Washington journalist, author and TV documentary executive. Readers may send him email at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Distributed by MCT Information Services
PHOTO of Martin Schram is available from the Columnist Mugs section of www.mctdirect.com.
The cause of division in this country and the main reason nothing gets done in this administration:
Rule #4...There can be no conversation between the organizer and his opponents. The latter must be depicted as being evil...Saul D. Alinsky, Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals...
If his compulsion to “agitate” makes it sound as if the organizer is disinclined to converse with those with whom he disagrees, that is because, well, he is. “You don’t communicate with anyone purely on the rational facts or ethics of an issue” (89). It is true that “moral rationalization is indispensable,” (43) that the organizer must “clothe” one’s goals and strategies with “moral arguments” (36). But there can be no conversation with one’s opponents, for to converse with them is to humanize them.
The organizer’s objective is to demonize those who stand in the way of his designs for change.
The reason for this is simple: “Men will act when they are convinced that their cause is 100 per cent on the side of the angels and that the opposition [is] 100 per cent on the side of the devil.” The organizer “knows that there can be no action until issues are polarized to this degree” (78).
From above: A bold, courageous personal presidential involvement -- a roll up your sleeves and quit fretting about legacy images effort -- may once again be what that exploding region and the world need right now...
*** How long will it take the American people to understand, President Obama does not solve problems or crisis, he is a community organizer from Chicago, he Creates problems and crisis?...
“In the beginning the organizer's first job is to create the issues or problems.”
― Saul D. Alinsky, Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals
"The first step in community (USA) organization is community (USA) disorganization", or stated differently, how to "Fundamentally Transform the United States of America.....
The organizer… must first rub raw the resentments of the people of the (USA)community; fan the latent hostilities of many of the people to the point of overt expression. He must search out controversy and issues, rather than avoid them, for unless there is controversy people are not concerned enough to act. . . . An organizer must stir up dissatisfaction and discontent; provide a channel into which the people can angrily pour their frustrations… you must agitate to the point of conflict......
And this is what has been happening since President Obama took the oath of office.
DEMS v GOP, rich v poor, black v white, gay v straight, and the list goes on. No unity, just division, and we all know a house divided won't last long....