OHSAA Board of Directors unanimously approve competitive balance proposal

Staff and wire report Published:

By a unanimous decision, the Ohio High School Athletic Association's Board of Directors approved a competitive balance proposal that makes modifications on how schools are placed in tournaments for team sports.

The plan was originally recommended to the Board by the 27-member OHSAA Competitive Balance Committee and is similar to the proposal that was presented to, then voted upon by member schools last spring.

In addition to the size of a school's enrollment, new modifying factors may be applied to students on each roster on a sport-by-sport basis that are based on where the student's parents reside and/or the educational system history of the student.

All schools will be subject to the new competitive-balance formula, which will be applied to students in the sports of football, soccer and volleyball in the fall, basketball in the winter and baseball and softball in the spring.

This year's referendum voting by the 825 high school principals will take place between May 1 and 15. If approved, it is anticipated the proposal will become effective for the 2016-17 school year.

"I'm extremely pleased with the plan that the committee has recommended and the Board has approved," said OHSAA Commissioner Dan Ross. "While the proposal is similar to last year's, the modified version is the result of a compilation of input from our superintendents, principals, athletic administrators and coaches. I'm most proud that we were able to work together and come up with a solution that will create a better system than we currently have because it looks at how schools secure the enrollment of their students participating in interscholastic athletics."

If passed, the new proposal will require schools to submit to the OHSAA their team rosters of student-athletes in grades 9 through 12 and to further provide more information about each student.

Students in public schools will be subject to modifying factors if their parents do not reside in the district or the student has not been continuously enrolled in the district since seventh grade, and students in non-public schools will be subject to the same modifying factors if they did not attend that school's designated "feeder" school(s) continuously since seventh grade or have not been continuously enrolled in the same system of education.

"I believe the Competitive Balance Committee has met its charge in that this proposal is not only reliable but also can be clearly applied and fairly administered for all member schools," Ross said, "with the ultimate objective being to promote competitive equity and ensuring that student-athletes will continue to learn life lessons in an education-based setting.

"The Board and Competitive Balance Committee are committed to continuing to study this issue, working on ways to improve the formula. As we've said in the past, this proposal, should it pass, is a starting point and any data and feedback gathered after the plan is rolled out will only help strengthen what changes can take place in the future. Any proposed formula changes in the future will also continue to be voted upon by the membership."

Want to leave your comments?

Sign in or Register to comment.

  • Once again, the Ohio High School Athletic Association has side-stepped the real issue of competative balance: private catholic schools who recruit (covertly) offering incentives (reduced or no tuition) versus public schools. Even with open enrollment, public schools are not on an even playing field, especially when it comes to the state tournaments. So why not have separate tournaments? MONEY, according to many school people I talk to! It (money) has destroyed professional sports,┬áit has destroyed college sports, and is destroying high school sports. If we continue to use it as the measure of success, it will destroy our country.